Quote:
Originally Posted by jyasaki
Does the term "Innocent until proven guilty" have any bearing here?
|
no he wasn't being charged with an offence. He was being warned that the officer believed he was/may be commiting an offence. In the event that he chose to continue doing so and charges brought then the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and I am sure it would have been chucked out in court. The difference here is the OP is looking for compensation for his additional costs, the burden of proof is now on him to show that the police incorrectly advised him.
Quote:
|
with no information to base that on (other than a wild-assed guess.)
|
we call that "suspicion" in this country! it wasn't impounded (that would have cost him much more!) - had the officer wished to bring charges he would have needed to make arrangements for the trailer to be weighed.