Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 28 March 2011, 21:54   #21
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: San Diego
Boat name: Stormbringer
Make: Avon Searider 5.4
Length: 5m +
Engine: 90hp Mariner
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Hard Deck Dims

jwn74, I have an aluminum hard deck and roll up deck you can measure. I am in San Diego, so you can get the exact dimensions then go and buy your marine plywood.
PM me and i will send you my email.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0990.jpg
Views:	541
Size:	68.5 KB
ID:	57969   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0983.jpg
Views:	669
Size:	66.8 KB
ID:	57970   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0988.jpg
Views:	812
Size:	62.1 KB
ID:	57971  
__________________
engarom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2011, 03:00   #22
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Midwest USA
Boat name: Avon 5.4
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 60hp Merc
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by captnjack View Post
They suck up weeds like mad. To the point of needing to tilt the motor and rake them off. We used a hand held garden tool for this job, its surprisingly hard to reach back there while on the water. Rocks not so much unless you are in water so shallow the tubes are scuffing.

Performance wise most jets lose about 20% of the rated HP compared to a prop. In my experience with them they are quite inefficient in the mid-range too. Its idle or full throttle.

Unless you have a specific need for a Jet (running in rivers or around swimmers as a rescue boat) I would stick with a conventional prop.
I had an E-Tech 40hp with a DuraJet lower on a Zodiac F470. I never had a weed problem but I tend to steer clear of the weedy patches anyway.

I agree with Captnjack- if you don't need a jet for reasons stated above then you are better off with a nice stainless prop. The performance will be better with a prop. We were doing some night ops with swimmers in the water so the added safety of the jet was a plus.

Attached please find some tech specs (propaganda from the jet folks) on the prop Vs. jet.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Evinrude 001.jpg
Views:	981
Size:	164.1 KB
ID:	58000   Click image for larger version

Name:	F470 with E-Tec DJ 40 002.jpg
Views:	898
Size:	210.7 KB
ID:	58001   Click image for larger version

Name:	F470 with E-Tec DJ 40 001.jpg
Views:	1727
Size:	194.4 KB
ID:	58002  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf DJ_vs[1]._Prop_Broch.pdf (70.6 KB, 844 views)
__________________
tmuenster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2011, 05:40   #23
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: British Columbia
Make: Gemini
Length: 4m +
Engine: 40hp 2 str
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by captnjack View Post
They suck up weeds like mad. To the point of needing to tilt the motor and rake them off. We used a hand held garden tool for this job, its surprisingly hard to reach back there while on the water. Rocks not so much unless you are in water so shallow the tubes are scuffing.

Performance wise most jets lose about 20% of the rated HP compared to a prop. In my experience with them they are quite inefficient in the mid-range too. Its idle or full throttle.

Unless you have a specific need for a Jet (running in rivers or around swimmers as a rescue boat) I would stick with a conventional prop.

Thanks Captain! I am really thinking about getting an ETEC 65 commercial (rope start, tiller) for my boat once I need to replace the current motor. Was concerned about the weight of a 240 lb etec on a 470 but it seems to be the norm for military applications nowadays.
__________________
prairie tuber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2011, 17:34   #24
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Seattle
Boat name: Water Dog
Make: Polaris
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yamaha 60hp
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmuenster View Post
I had an E-Tech 40hp with a DuraJet lower on a Zodiac F470. I never had a weed problem but I tend to steer clear of the weedy patches anyway.

I agree with Captnjack- if you don't need a jet for reasons stated above then you are better off with a nice stainless prop. The performance will be better with a prop. We were doing some night ops with swimmers in the water so the added safety of the jet was a plus.

Attached please find some tech specs (propaganda from the jet folks) on the prop Vs. jet.
The "Durajet" is really more like a Kort nozzle on a prop than a Jet. Agree its probably better for those who just want swimmer/diver protection. Performance-wise it looks pretty damn good too. For shallow water running where there are logs and stumps in your river, this is what I meant by "Jet".
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jetdrive4stroke_f80_jet_c30f50db.jpg
Views:	581
Size:	30.3 KB
ID:	58019   Click image for larger version

Name:	600_f80jet_right_profile_89e146be.jpg
Views:	328
Size:	25.0 KB
ID:	58020  
__________________
captnjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2011, 20:42   #25
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Midwest USA
Boat name: Avon 5.4
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 60hp Merc
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by captnjack View Post
The "Durajet" is really more like a Kort nozzle on a prop than a Jet. Agree its probably better for those who just want swimmer/diver protection. Performance-wise it looks pretty damn good too. For shallow water running where there are logs and stumps in your river, this is what I meant by "Jet".
Ah, yes, a Yamaha Outboard Jet lower will come at cost in HP. The benefit is running in much more shallow water than an Etech DuraJet or traditional outboard.

I have another boat that was made by RiverPro. It will run in 3" of water at 50mph. The bottom is thick aluminum that is made for harsh river conditions. Basically it is a Jon boat with 200 hp jet. Merc put the 250hp Optimax power head on the jet drive just to get the 200 hp output. That's a 20% loss of power and the inboard jet drive system is much more effecient than a outboard jet drive system. The RiverPro is the best boat I have ever seen on a river but it was not designed for big water or open water. It is a rough ride in big waves. I've got my wife talked into letting me keep the RiverPro and my project SeaRider 5.4 for the lakes.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	108_0835.JPG
Views:	430
Size:	140.8 KB
ID:	58021  
__________________
tmuenster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2011, 04:52   #26
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Winnipeg
Make: Zodiac
Length: 4m +
Engine: outboard 55
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
55 military vs 65 commercial Etec

I have an older 55 Evinrude on F470 with hard deck. I have had several of these boats. I had a Merc 50 4 stroke, a Johnson military 30 horse and a Honda for a short time. I have run 25's and 15's on smaller Zodiacs. I have been diving off of these for many years and barely get on step with a full load and 4 stroke. I like the look and theory of the jet drive, and they suggest no loss of power, but I would not want to gamble. If I did, perhaps someone with experience would know if there is a way to adjust the pitch like with a more conventional prop? My fellow Winnipeger is right on the money, the 2 stroke etec 65 is a 240 lb motor with a great hole shot. They will want $7200 new, and no one stocks it in Canada yet. My transom handled a 50 4 stroke easy, but you need to keep the boat tight. (which is tricky when the lake freezes over night).
__________________
squishy boat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2011, 17:00   #27
Member
 
Country: USA
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 17
Sorry to go off topic, but I was thinking of upgrading to one of these types of boats. I currently have a Futura MKII. How do these boats handle rough water compared to something like I have? I sure would love to have the additional space!
__________________
mgalvez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 April 2011, 18:19   #28
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Winnipeg
Make: Zodiac
Length: 4m +
Engine: outboard 55
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
MkII vs F470

I went from MkI to F470 10 years ago. Night and day. On the lakes there is a hugh difference in the chop. You will need to trailer or crane the F470 if you launch solo as you will cause damage doing it alone. The MkI sits and will likely sit until the kids want to play with it. The only disadvantage is weight and price. Excellent for diving.
__________________
squishy boat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2011, 02:42   #29
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: GTA
Boat name: Seabright
Make: Seabright
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP ETec Tiller
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 234
Hey Martini, Re. that bag, its definitely Zodiac. Their accessory line is branded Access. You can see in the pics there is an aluminum extrusion attached to the transom which has a tubular slot running its length. The bag has a cylindrical tag along the length of its back, like heavy piping, which slides into the aluminum thus securing it.
Guess I got lucky when they threw it in with the boat. Those MilPro boats look wicked!
__________________
Northern Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2011, 16:56   #30
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Boat name: Janey
Make: Zodiac
Length: 4m +
Engine: Outboard Yamaha 20hp
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Hi Guys,
These are the boats we use in the Marines. We use a Tohatsu 50 and they go like a rocket with just the coxswain in. Instead of fuel tanks we use Avon fuel bags and carry 4 which gives us a range of about 80nm.
Ours are Hypalon and weigh 650kgs with engine and fuel and are supposedly man portable. The aluminium hard floor is a major pain in the arse to fit, the roll up slatted deck with jump off board our preferred choice.
They come with a manual that says they're a militarized Zodiac fastroller Mk3 if that helps anyone.
They are majorly robust and take a hammering from us due to the nature of the job. They work brilliantly in surf due to the speed tubes.
__________________
Bighag7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2011, 17:21   #31
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Pike View Post
Hey Martini, Re. that bag, its definitely Zodiac. Their accessory line is branded Access. You can see in the pics there is an aluminum extrusion attached to the transom which has a tubular slot running its length. The bag has a cylindrical tag along the length of its back, like heavy piping, which slides into the aluminum thus securing it.
Guess I got lucky when they threw it in with the boat. Those MilPro boats look wicked!
Thanks NP, I searched everywhere, the nearest I could find was the type that attach to a thwart seat. No worries though, I've bought a bag designed to mount on an ATV which suits my needs quite well
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 02:20   #32
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: New Jersey
Make: 733
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yanmar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 234
I just saw this boat and thought all of you fc470 guys could get some good ideas from it.

This is easily the nicest one Ive ever seen.

http://www.rib.net/forum/f47/zodiac-f470-41453.html
__________________
95gstnj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 July 2011, 19:27   #33
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Torrance, CA
Make: Zodiac F470
Length: 3m +
Engine: 50HP Honda 4 Stroke
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1
This is my F470. I put in an aluminum floor and a console from a MKII with a Honda 50hp 4stroke. Really fun boat.


__________________
Hebby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 July 2011, 21:34   #34
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: jacksonville
Make: zodiac g470
Length: 5m +
Engine: etec 25
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11
Wow,

Had no idea this page has gotten so long. The follow up on the floor leak....seller wanted me to mail the floor back to ohio, then reglue it, then have them send it back. It was too much hassle for me. So now I just have a slow leak in the HP floor that I top off before I go out.

Some people are asking how it handles seas...I have never thought these boats handle chop very well, these boats meaning soft bottom inflatables. The chop really slaps and pushes the bow around, and in big enough chop (1 t 3) you really can't go too fast, i.e. plane. You can try, but getting thrown out of the boat is likely. This is my experience using these boats with tiller motors.

I have had these things out 10 to 15 miles diving when I was young and stupid, and can say they are nearly impossible to flip or sink. My idea of fun however has changed as I've matured, and now I'd much rather go offshore in a 26 foot cat then an inflatable.

Someone asked about comparing to futuras, etc. The 470 and certainly the 530 are better left inflated and on a trailer, and launched at the boat ramp, rather then deflated in the back of a pick up.

I've worn out a couple of transoms storing and deploying inflatables a couple hundred times, so now I just leave it on the trailer.

In my opinion, for a recreational user, these boats are ideal for someone who wants to do rivers, creeks, intracoastal waterways, or who live in an area with good dive sites within a couple miles of shore.

I'm going to take mine a couple miles offshore this week and do a dive or two, will try and take some pics...

I've finally decided to stop trying to fish off these boats, as no matter how careful you are a hook or fin will find paydirt no matter how careful you are.
__________________
mdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2011, 22:20   #35
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: jacksonville
Make: zodiac g470
Length: 5m +
Engine: etec 25
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 11
Ive gotten some amazing gas mileage out of the etec. Sometime soon I'm going to post my result of running a two gallon tank dry on some smooth water and post up my numbers.

I'm guessing I got about 14 to 15 mpg last time out with 450 pounds payload onboard. And this was in some really crappy wind chop.

I wish I could try other props on this Etec 25 without having to buy a whole bunch. Im guessing with the weight of the boat only being 400lbs. fueled, a very aggressive larger diameter prop could be used, giving even better fuel burn and top end. The stock is a 12 inch.
__________________
mdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 May 2013, 16:10   #36
Member
 
F470's Avatar
 
Country: USA
Town: Portland
Boat name: Tilikum
Make: Zodiac FC-470
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki DT-40
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 246
I know this is an older post but has anyone found a cargo net specifically designed for a Zodiac FC470? The links below no longer work. Who made these?

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
Just thought I share my recent learnings on the subject of storage...

Another heads up for anyone interested: While my google search terms went from zodiac bag to cargo bag etc etc, I turned up a cargo net designed specifically for the FC470. This I thought could be really handy as well as adding to the "Mil-factor". (Did I just invent a new catchphrase? )

http://www.trgear.com/osc/eshop/prod...roducts_id/155

They're made for the US military so I guess they're really well made but priced between 300-400 USD made me hesitate briefly!

However I came across an eBay auction yesterday where there was 4 (brand new) for sale at $49.00 Needless to say there's only 3 now but if anyone's looking for a bargain:

eBay
__________________
F470 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 May 2013, 18:16   #37
Member
 
F470's Avatar
 
Country: USA
Town: Portland
Boat name: Tilikum
Make: Zodiac FC-470
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki DT-40
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 246
I really like this. Can you send me the template or drawings?

Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newport F470 View Post
Here are some photos of the hard deck I recently built. I made it from marine grade plywood. I'm still trying to figure out what to do for the joint between the fore and aft boards, although the boards work fine and stay in place by themselves.

I have a crude template I used. You can have it if you want. Its just a drawing on cardboard.
__________________
F470 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2013, 20:32   #38
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Gresham Or
Boat name: Money Pit
Make: Zodiac
Length: 4m +
Engine: in process
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11
My FC470 is a 1992 model boat. I am currently running the factory roll up floor. (I have an extra floor if anybody wants to buy one) Anyway, I found a decent deal on a used Yamaha 40hp short shaft Jet. The transom on my boat calls for a short shaft motor. My question is, will I notice the loss of power between a prop & a Jet on this size of boat? I also like the looks of that marine grade plywood floor! It looks like the floor I put in the bed of my 54 Ford F-100!
__________________
twtrk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2013, 21:03   #39
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by F470 View Post
I know this is an older post but has anyone found a cargo net specifically designed for a Zodiac FC470? The links below no longer work. Who made these?
It turned out the net didn't fit the bow of an FC470 at all, it was rectangular in shape. I cut it down to fit better and played around with the attachments etc.

Search for Load Tamer cargo nets, buy one for a pick up truck or similar and chop it to suit. Don't pay too much though, they're nothing special really.
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2013, 19:40   #40
Member
 
Locozodiac's Avatar
 
Country: Other
Town: Lima-Peru
Boat name: Nautile
Make: Sea Rider 450 Rib
Length: 4m +
Engine: Tohatsu 5/18/30 HP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,998
A lightly loaded F470 is ideal for a 30 HP minimum, will have more fun than with a 25. You need to air top tubes and air deck to factory recommended working pressures with gauge once sib is floating for some minutes rest to let time for pressure to stabilize, then top again if needed.

Some months ago beated (20) F420/470 sibs equiped with 30 & 40 HP engines on a mile race with flat calm, no wind waters. Shamely on them, all were beaten with a 430 rib with just a portable 18 HP engine, due to : all were under inflated rocking worst than a large marshmellow, their problem, not mine.

Happy Boating
__________________
Locozodiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 18:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.