Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 11 April 2008, 13:21   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Argyll
Make: Rib-X
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2007 - Honda 150hp
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Fuel efficiency.

I have quite a standard RIB.

6.5m Rib from rib-x
150hp Honda 4 stroke (2007)
200 litre fuel tank.

get-me-home 5hp reserve honda engine
20 litre reserve engine fuel tank.

a rear bench, 2 double jockey seats, a big console

added to a Hull weight of 380kg....

.... Can anyone give me an idea of expected fuel consumption. The fuel gauge is very vague and I was hoping someone might know ballpark figures.

What would the most fuel efficient speed be?

Figures with 2 pax (160kg) and 10 pax (800kg) would be appreciated in both slight and moderate waters.
__________________
xp640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 14:12   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Boat name: Tinkerbell
Make: Rib
Length: 7m +
Engine: Merc
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 296
This totally depends on how you run it

We on average burn approx 20 l/h running fairly fast 5500 rpm

If you throttle back to 5000 you see about 16 l/h

One of our commercial drivers on this forum is brilliant his boat consumes 2/3 of the fuel of the other boats.

He doesnt go over 5000rpm as this is when they really guzzle
__________________
Trailer Bloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 15:05   #3
Member
 
Nick Hearne's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bucks
Boat name: Blue & Ding Dong
Make: Ribeye,SR4 & Bombard
Length: 6m +
Engine: 115,50 & 15Hp Yams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,252
I would say at around 25 knots you would be looking at 1 Lt per mile!
__________________
Nick Hearne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 15:10   #4
Member
 
Millermob's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Boat name: Emperor
Make: Scorpion
Length: 7m +
Engine: Evinrude E-tec 200hp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 317
Send a message via MSN to Millermob
On our Avon 620 with Honda 150, we used to average 16lph at roughly 22 knots in calm / moderate seas with 5 on board - equated to just over 4000 rpm.

Not sure about figures with extra weight.

This was running a 4 blade adjustable prop!
__________________
Millermob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 15:53   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Inverness
Boat name: none
Make: none
Engine: none
MMSI: none
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,908
There are a couple of Argyll folk on here but it is a big place. Which part do you hail from?
__________________
BruceB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 20:14   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Argyll
Make: Rib-X
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2007 - Honda 150hp
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
port appin / loch creran.
__________________
xp640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 22:39   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: sheffield
Boat name: barracuda
Make: Humber 7.6 mts
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200HP mercury
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 181
re fuel eff

hi
just get the rib on the plane so just the back end is in the water this i feel is the most fuel effective.
also depends on the prop pitch and the boat load , just trial and error to get the rib just on the plane any faster and you just burn more fuel but get there quicker
its like doing 55 mph on the motorway too slow but 70 is useing more fuel
thanks
stephen
__________________
stepheneyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2008, 23:49   #8
Member
 
Hightower's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Fareham
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,866
That size of RIB and engine combo I would factor at least 1mile/litre as a ball part figure and then deduct 20% for a safety factor untill you get to know your RIB. So for a 200litre tank that would be a 200 mile maximum range less 40 miles....So go no further than 160 miles on a full tank.

One thing to remember is to gauge how much fuel gets pumped into the tank as some fuel tanks say 200 litres capacity but might hold less than this because of poor installation. My BWM would fill to the brim whilst filling on the water but when on the trailer the nose was higher and couldn't get full capacity because an air trap would develop at the front of the tank, if I wasn't carefull push the fuel suddenly up the filler hose with expected results.
__________________
Andy

Looks Slow but is Fast
Member of the ebay Blue RIB cover club.
Hightower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2008, 00:00   #9
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: San Carlos, Mexico
Boat name: INDE
Make: LOMAC 730
Length: 7m +
Engine: 200 Merc.
MMSI: Please press 1
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,688
Send a message via Skype™ to Limey Linda
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepheneyre View Post
hi
just get the rib on the plane so just the back end is in the water this i feel is the most fuel effective.
also depends on the prop pitch and the boat load , just trial and error to get the rib just on the plane any faster and you just burn more fuel but get there quicker
its like doing 55 mph on the motorway too slow but 70 is useing more fuel
thanks
stephen
This approach may not always be the correct one for best economy. Most engines are at their most economical at 3500-4000 rpm. If you read enough engine/boat test reports you will that this is so. Some times it is more economical to run at 4000 than 3500. Remember the faster you go the less hull in the water up to a point. If you can find that sweet spot then that is usually the most effecient. Of course sea conditions have a lot to do with it.
__________________
Running around like a head with it's chicken cut off.
Limey Linda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.