Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 13 April 2012, 03:55   #11
Member
 
Nick Hearne's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bucks
Boat name: Blue & Ding Dong
Make: Ribeye,SR4 & Bombard
Length: 6m +
Engine: 115,50 & 15Hp Yams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,242
I have had them on 3 boats SR4, 5.75 Viper & a 6.5m hard boat, I found the them very stern heavy with too many people wanting to sit at the back the 6.5m hada 220hp inboard so plenty of power but you get 10 people all sitting too far back & it would really struggle to get up and go but ones fitted the fins did a great job making low spead estuary work muck better being able to trim in & putting the bow down!
I bought my SR4 with them fitted & it has a 50hp 2st so again not under powered & again I can trim in & keep the bow well down, I did try I with out the other day as it was just me going out & I gained about2 knots & it chime walked terribly without them so I put them straight back on!
__________________

__________________
Member of the Ribeye supporters club!!!
Member of Bombard 380 Aerotec club
Member of SR4 club
Nick Hearne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 05:40   #12
Member
 
longjohn's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bournemouth
Boat name: Seadrive
Make: Capelli Tempest 470
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki DF70
MMSI: 235079113
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 541
I didn't want to drill the can plate simple fitting so I fitted this beginning of last season:

Force 4 Marine Dynamics Stingray Stealth Hydrofoil - Only 89.95 - Force 4 Chandlery

- just slips over the anti can plate and then held in place with 6 grub screws horizontally tightening to the sharp edge of the can plate - there is a gripper bar between the screws and the plate - so no damage. You can see the 3 grub screw holes from the underneath shot attached.

Still firmly in place after more than a year - still good for well over 30knots - possibly a knot or two reduction in top speed not sure. On the fuel consumption side don't think it makes much difference except at low speeds as I can now plane within the harbour speed limit and its much much easier to maintain at just on the plane speed. Jumps immediately onto the plane with almost no bow lift. Much less pitching action and more stable in rough seas. Boat was never under powered (70Hp on a 4.7m) but was probably a bit stern heavy.

All in all thoroughly recommendable.

John
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0387.jpg
Views:	264
Size:	140.2 KB
ID:	67124   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0388.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	114.7 KB
ID:	67125   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0389.jpg
Views:	197
Size:	117.5 KB
ID:	67126  
__________________

__________________
longjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 08:20   #13
Member
 
amityslave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Boat name: BamBam
Make: Base Marine
Length: 5m +
Engine: outboard, petrol, 50
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Thanks Longjohn, looked at the Force 4 option but decided the construction/design of the Piranha two part version should be just as good for less than half the price (already on order anyway). Not a problem to fit for me as I fitout boats all day long!!

Getting it up faster for less energy without poking myself in the eye is the goal....... just like a viagra advert really.

Cheers
__________________
amityslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 08:35   #14
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: Wildheart
Make: Humber/Delta Seasafe
Length: 5m +
Engine: Merc 60 Clamshell
MMSI: 235068449
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,611
Getting on the plane a few seconds earlier is all very well, but once there do you cruise for miles and miles on the plane? The plus points for these only really kick in when:
- you have a modern engine that doesn't drink at low RPM
- you have a long run of 8 knot speed limit down the river to get to the open sea
- you are doing a lot of stop - start (e.g. Rescue boat)

Bottom line is these will create drag whilst being pulled through the water. Any wing does. Other than reducing your speed to "just on the plane" for long perioods will likely cancel any savings you see by getting on the plane quicker. If you have power trim, tucking it in to get on the plan has much the same effect.

I have removed them from 2 secondhand ribs so far as they reduced the handling to atrocious levels, and lost me 2 knots off the top speed!

Which reminds me, anyone want a pair of cheap fins?.......
__________________
9D280 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 08:57   #15
Member
 
amityslave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Boat name: BamBam
Make: Base Marine
Length: 5m +
Engine: outboard, petrol, 50
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Thanks 9D280, I take your points. The most relevant to me will be your last two, I will be doing both a lot of distance when just on the plane, and there is also going to be a lot of stop start as a support boat (inshore rag and stick types needing someone to hold their hand).
It's the distance bit: cruising at around 10-15knots that I really would like to improve, at present this is a grievous mix of on and off plane with the type of swell and short chop common around my cruising grounds. There's no river issues as I'm straight out to sea. At present it's balls out (hense the name BamBam) or dribble along, hopefully I can iron out some of the extremes of conditions and hit a happy medium.
__________________
amityslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2012, 19:28   #16
Member
 
longjohn's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bournemouth
Boat name: Seadrive
Make: Capelli Tempest 470
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki DF70
MMSI: 235079113
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9D280 View Post
Bottom line is these will create drag whilst being pulled through the water. Any wing does. Other than reducing your speed to "just on the plane" for long perioods will likely cancel any savings you see by getting on the plane quicker. If you have power trim, tucking it in to get on the plan has much the same effect.
Having just fitted a bigger built in ss/s fuel tank amidships, which will have affected the boat balance/trim to some degree. I thought I would do some testing with an without the hydrofoil/wing fitted.
tested:
  • Top speed
  • min plane speed
  • WOT max RPM
  • and general handling
finding were that:
  • Top speed - identical with and without 'foil
  • Min plane speed - at least 3 knots lower and much easier to hold just on plane speed, with the hydrofoil fitted. (Easily within the harbour 10 knot limit)
  • WOT max RPM - identical (i.e. recommended max RPM for engine @WOT achieved)
  • Better handling with a smoother & more stable ride with hydrofoil fitted
So don't agree with the quote above - for my boat it's a great improvement at all speeds. And given that top speed and WOT RPM are identical with and without, I would suggest that there is no overall increase in drag caused by the hydrofoil. In fact, at high speed, most of the 'foil appears to be clear of the water. And 'tucking the engine in' to get on the plane quicker in much more effective with the 'foil, producing a nice level, more or less instant transition to plane with no interim high bow attitude.


Appreciate it's horses for courses and not all boats respond, benefit or require to the same degree. I see 'foils as a cheaper, simpler alternative to trim tabs (with effectively automatic operation) on smaller boats.
__________________
longjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2012, 04:46   #17
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: Wildheart
Make: Humber/Delta Seasafe
Length: 5m +
Engine: Merc 60 Clamshell
MMSI: 235068449
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by longjohn View Post
In fact, at high speed, most of the 'foil appears to be clear of the water.
And there's your answer - with your setup you get the lift, but then the foils are clear of the draggy stuff when moving.

Best of both worlds!


As my SR4 / 25Hp was "underpowered" the foils never lifted clear - all they did was nose dive the bow! The current boat made it incredibly difficulty to steer at anything abouve about 18 knots, and made the ride very uncomfortable in a short swell. No PT in either case so it was always going to be a compromise.
__________________
9D280 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2012, 04:54   #18
Member
 
amityslave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Boat name: BamBam
Make: Base Marine
Length: 5m +
Engine: outboard, petrol, 50
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 23
thanks Longjohn and 9D280, the next couple of weeks will be the tester, I'll do a report when I get back. Weather and work stopped play before I had a chance, this time I should get at least a full week of cruising. I think with a fairly common layout of 5.2m boat, 50HP 2-stroke, 2x 25ltr fuel tanks at the rear, it should be of use to a few people.
I finally went for the Piranha foils, price was right and composite material is bomb proof.
I'll be in touch!
__________________
amityslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 July 2012, 10:37   #19
Member
 
amityslave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Boat name: BamBam
Make: Base Marine
Length: 5m +
Engine: outboard, petrol, 50
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 23
..............and I'm back in the room.

Well well well that was fun. The new fins worked better than expected!
With 2 crew and a full fuel load in the stern (50lt) not to mention the packed lunches, we got on the plane almost instantly at 6-7 knots. The fins remain below at this speed, but from 10ish they surface and we are flying along.
We had a total of two weeks of play in various conditions, but in each case we rose above it.
Detail:
Piranha Fins (two part port/stbd)
Shaft tucked well under on a stock Tohatsu 50 2-stroke
No towing

The basic positive results are:
Nose stays much lower at very slow speeds and stays lower on take off
Acceleration from just on the plane is much improved
Gets up on the plane much much faster (almost instantly)
Ride quality is noticeably smoother
Handling is twice as responsive with extremely hair raising turns

Although the fuel burn seemed to be about the same, I take the point that anything that potentially drags is gonna cost more. This said the fins seemed to be riding at 'water level' at speed, our need to make distance at 8-10 knots (fins just submerged) might be the real burner. We were having too much fun flat out to try distance at slower speeds!

Hope this helps others, I'll update as the year progresses. Thanks to everyone who has inputted, it just goes to show each experience is different, luckily mines a goodun!!
__________________
amityslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2012, 11:43   #20
DJS
Member
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Boat name: *
Make: replacement soon!
Length: no boat
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 143
[QUOTE=longjohn;456104]I didn't want to drill the can plate simple fitting so I fitted this beginning of last season:

I am thinking of one of these for my speedboat which is a bit stern heavy with a 90 4 stroke and amongst other things e.g. bow in the air, it also tends to porpoise if I trim up! I am also looking at the Cobra stainless version and just help with comparisons do you have the dimensions available for the stingray?

Thanks in advance!
__________________

__________________
DJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.