Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 14 October 2008, 08:56   #1
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Cheap or "quality"...

..can you achieve both?

Reading the thread on Prosport and various other threads on here… I thought I’d throw some “food for thought” into the pot..

I’ve seen boats laminated up by good laminators, shite laminators and good laminators who don’t give a shite. They all look “shiny” when fresh from the mold but can you tell that the lay up was carried out as specified in the design? Or done wet-on-wet and not over a long time period? How good is the structure of your boat that is hidden by the glass? Quality hard wood or some cheapo soft wood/shuttering ply? Was the correct resin used for the GRP tanks? How a surveyor, who has not been present during the build, can assess these is purely down to the paper work supplied by the builder. Even the builder, in some outfits, may not be aware off all that has gone on, on the shop-floor. Buy off some one who runs a tight ship and PAY for it.. it’s cheaper in the long run than constantly searching for cheap, cheap, cheap…cheap inevitably leads to corner cutting/time pressures with predictable results.. only my opinion.
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 09:25   #2
Member
 
m chappelow's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: yorkshire
Boat name: little vicky
Make: avon ex RNLI
Length: 3m +
Engine: tohatsu
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,310
over the years there has been some very good builds and some very bad ones , a number of years ago we scrapped and cut up a number of various boats mainly speed boats and the odd sailing which had been left abandoned in a boat yard ,granted the boats were from the 1970s with a few from the early1980s but the quality of layup and the way things were hidden was at times was shocking , from chip board which resembled wet wheatabix, to thin layered unresined matting all in out of sight , unreacheble corners and voids where no could get to ,poorly fitted skin fittings, fuel tank vents ect, all from the original build ,if i was buying a new boat think i would be looking a bit more deeply into what i was parting my money for .
__________________
m chappelow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 11:14   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Gloucestershire
Boat name: Osprey
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 5m +
Engine: E-tec 300 G2
MMSI: TBC
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono View Post
..can you achieve both?

Reading the thread on Prosport and various other threads on here… I thought I’d throw some “food for thought” into the pot..

I’ve seen boats laminated up by good laminators, shite laminators and good laminators who don’t give a shite. They all look “shiny” when fresh from the mold but can you tell that the lay up was carried out as specified in the design? Or done wet-on-wet and not over a long time period? How good is the structure of your boat that is hidden by the glass? Quality hard wood or some cheapo soft wood/shuttering ply? Was the correct resin used for the GRP tanks? How a surveyor, who has not been present during the build, can assess these is purely down to the paper work supplied by the builder. Even the builder, in some outfits, may not be aware off all that has gone on, on the shop-floor. Buy off some one who runs a tight ship and PAY for it.. it’s cheaper in the long run than constantly searching for cheap, cheap, cheap…cheap inevitably leads to corner cutting/time pressures with predictable results.. only my opinion.
Thats why I love Osprey. There is only one man who builds them (Mike) and has been doing so from day one. You can't rush him either (I should know, I tried )
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
Chris Stevens

Born fiddler
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 11:38   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Jono, I think this is a good topic for discussion and a change from the recent slide on ribnet of the topics becoming a bit, um...light in nature but I guess one could become a little unpopular with some builders. I personally, mostly , shy away from direct criticism of a build or boat's construction but I could be tempted by a good thread to, err, be constructive in my comments. .

When buying, I suppose it would be good to see the build of your boat in progress but you'd need to be aware of what to look for to identify the signs of poor technique. Once the build is complete, it would be difficult to tell whether the structure was the best if the outer finish was good and sound. There are sometimes tell-tails. However, I'm not sure of a couple of things; 1. that all builders are aware of best practise and 2. that it is necessarily quicker to do something badly than it is to do it correctly. Much of the time during the construction of something is taken up in the finishing and attention to detail and that is something which has improved markedly over the last few years.

Referring to a number of build threads on ribnet and boatmad, where the builder is showing off their work, there is plainly poor laminating and often a lack of appreciation of structural engineering. Given that these threads are to some extent promotional, it would appear the builder is ignorant of what they are displaying to those who can recognise it. Wet on wet, or not, would be difficult to find in a finished boat unless there was structural failure.

There are instances too where failures on the 'respected' makes of boat have arisen from poor technique or lack of attention during the build, so it's not only the lesser makes that are prone to problems.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 11:48   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
A mate of mine spent all his hard earned cash on a large caravan - an Avondale Argente. Avondale are supposed to be one of the best makes and have been going for years. All CE approved and lots of lovely paperwork!!!

The build quality was a joke. The front and back ends started splittting and delaminating. It was only 1yr old and had been used about 3 times. They refused to replace the caravan and insisted the dealer do the repair. It took 8 weeks and was a total disaster.

So the right paperwork doesn't really prove anything - you could still end up with a rogue product.
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 12:46   #6
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn View Post
A mate of mine spent all his hard earned cash on a large caravan - an Avondale Argente. Avondale are supposed to be one of the best makes and have been going for years. .....
If only he'd asked you to "Google" it.. he'd have known that Avondale have/had a reputation for "cracking" problems...took me 30 seconds to find that out..

...somewhat off topic though. I'm not saying that "CE" paperwork is worth anything. As has been well proven, it still relies on the integrity of the builder. Reading, quite carefully, the summing up it’s apparent that even without the correct paper work if the build had been to the “expected” quality there wouldn’t have ever been an issue with the boat. Concealed faults in the transom for example. Interestingly, my point is underlined by this phrase in the judgement…although this refers to “Big Yellow”

"Both authorised surveyors/examiners commented that the outward appearance of the hull was particularly good.”


The (Prosport) builder was acknowledged as “living hand to mouth” and this leads to failings as a few of us have witnessed. Buy “cheap” at your peril….
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 12:50   #7
Member
 
Leapy's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheepy Parva
Boat name: Sadly Sold
Length: no boat
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by codprawn View Post
A mate of mine spent all his hard earned cash on a large caravan - an Avondale Argente. Avondale are supposed to be one of the best makes and have been going for years. All CE approved and lots of lovely paperwork!!!

The build quality was a joke
Avondale have now gone into administration!
__________________
Leapy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 12:58   #8
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leapy View Post
Avondale have now gone into administration!
I suspect the credit crunch and the worst 2 summers on record has something to do with it!!!

"A CARAVAN manufacturer in north Warwickshire has suspended manufacturing with the potential loss of nearly 150 jobs - the latest victims of the credit crunch.
Avondale Coachcraft, based in Carlyon Road, Atherstone, went into administration yesterday after trading for more than 40 years.
Mark Hopkins and Matthew Hammond, of PricewaterhouseCoopers, have been appointed joint administrators of the company.
Avondale Coachcraft has been involved in the design and manufacture of touring caravans with an annual turnover of around £16million and employs 149 people from its head offices in Atherstone, selling its range of caravans throughout the UK."
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 13:36   #9
Member
 
Erin's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: A large rock
Boat name: La Frette
Make: Osprey Vipermax
Length: 6m +
Engine: 200 Suzzy
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,893
There's a blurry line between 'cheap' and value for money, especially when it comes to boats, which nearly always appear expensive when compared to other leisure products.

I've been at the sharp end with an economy boat, and I think I was lucky to overcome my problems before Prosport closed shop. My original hull was clearly inadequately built, a fact which the company admitted, and blamed upon their laminator for not doing his job properly. Pay peanuts and you get monkeys is probably the most apt saying here.

Unlike cars which are built on a mechanised production line with controlled standards and normally come with a warranty for 3 or 5 years, most boats are hand built with the vagaries of quality which all humans can suffer.

I knew I was buying a cheap boat (I wouldn't have been able to afford a new one otherwise) but I had hoped that the builder would have taken safety and fit for purpose seriously, especially considering his employment/involvement with the lifeboat and port radio.

If you are going to a complete unknown manufacturer you would have to be far more cautious than with a big name and good reputation. I don't think any legislation, without being extremely overbearing could protect all of us from all possible problems. Even houses covered by NHBC 'guarantees' suffer problems which really should have been spotted by the inspectors. And that is a fairly well regulated process.

Ultimately the builders need to take more responsilbility to ensure their products are built correctly. How you encourage or demand that responsibility is the difficult bit.
__________________
Erin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 15:16   #10
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,622
Jono - I agree that anything which is much cheaper than its competitors is probably going to be as good quality. However the corollary is not always true either - simply paying more doesn't necessarily mean you get better quality - ie. the most expensive is not necessarily the best.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 15:29   #11
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polwart View Post
the most expensive is not necessarily the best.
Especially true when dealing with "name" brands, and moreso in the luxury range of products.


jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 15:42   #12
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: Tobermory, Canada eh
Boat name: Verius
Make: Zodiac Hurricane 590
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha F150
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,366
Send a message via MSN to Stoo
"Best" isn't always necessary though either...

Depending on the intended use, it might not be necessary to have the best money can buy either. I compared my 15 year old Zodiac Hurricane to a friend's recently acquired Bombard. Mine is a completely different "animal", but it would also cost between three and four times as much as his by today's prices, even though the bpats are about the same size.

For what he wants his boat for, his Bombard was a good choice. Would he rather have a Hurricane? Absolutely. But the difference in cost couldn't be justified...
__________________
Pump it up and RIDE!

www.wetspotimages.com
Stoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:00   #13
Member
 
Nasher's Avatar
 
Country: Other
Town: Principalite d'Chaos
Boat name: The Nashers Revenge!
Make: Windsor Brothers
Length: 6m +
Engine: Optimax 225
MMSI: "Mmmmm SI" she said!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erin View Post
Unlike cars which are built on a mechanised production line with controlled standards and normally come with a warranty for 3 or 5 years, most boats are hand built with the vagaries of quality which all humans can suffer.
Very true

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polwart View Post
Jono - I agree that anything which is much cheaper than its competitors is probably going to be as good quality. However the corollary is not always true either - simply paying more doesn't necessarily mean you get better quality - ie. the most expensive is not necessarily the best.
Couldn't agree more
A simple example is the more expensive range of Halfords tools.
They are cheaper than for example Draper, but in my experiance last longer in heavy use.


Nasher
__________________
Nasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:19   #14
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nasher View Post
Very true



Couldn't agree more
A simple example is the more expensive range of Halfords tools.
They are cheaper than for example Draper, but in my experiance last longer in heavy use.


Nasher
The Halfords pro range are brilliant - lifetime guarantee and made by Britool. Just as good as Snap On and way cheaper!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:20   #15
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoo View Post
Depending on the intended use, it might not be necessary to have the best money can buy either. ..

Yup..spot on. I have an exquisitely made set of Japanese chisels in the workshop that I can’t bring myself to use. I also have a set of Marples chisels, which I use all the time and perform admirably and will last a lifetime if not abused. They are both good “quality” but the Japanese ones, by virtue of their manufacture are a Hell of a lot dearer and will hold an edge better..but the “Cheapies” will outperform me every time…however….. you can buy “really” cheap chisels that are only fit for stirring paint with. If you look in our DIY type shops you’ll see that it is now getting more and more difficult to buy “good” tools as the public have been refusing to pay for “quality” items. This is even reflected by some of the major manufacturers outsourcing and re-branding to have any hope of competing…. However, because I’m a bit of a tool (Yes Dave, I know) snob.. I am well aware of this so can make a judgement based on my intended level of use and expectation of performance.
What if two tools looked the same, both came in a nice shiny box, complete with CE marking, but vastly different prices? Should I choose the cheap one because I think that essentially they’ll be the same…or should I choose the dear one because I think that the cheap one must be junk at that price?…..


How thick is the lay-up on your hull? Are you sure?
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:39   #16
GED
Member
 
GED's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: CONWY/CORFU
Boat name: The Full Morty II
Make: Air Craft/Shakespere
Length: 8m +
Engine: Etec 300hp/Etec150hp
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 603
How thick is the lay-up on your hull? Are you sure? [/QUOTE]

As a rule of thumb can't you tell by the weight of the hull ....wow this is going to open a can of worms
__________________
GED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:40   #17
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nasher View Post
Very true



Couldn't agree more
A simple example is the more expensive range of Halfords tools.
They are cheaper than for example Draper, but in my experiance last longer in heavy use.


Nasher

Draper don't actually "make" anything at all....do they?
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 16:50   #18
Member
 
Leapy's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sheepy Parva
Boat name: Sadly Sold
Length: no boat
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polwart View Post
I agree that anything which is much cheaper than its competitors is probably going to be as good quality.
Did you mean this?
__________________
Leapy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 17:09   #19
Member
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Over here
Boat name: S.S. Nobstick
Make: Three Wise Monkeys
Length: 3m +
Engine: 44lbs of thrust....
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,127
...back onto boats.... we have to include, in build costs the recouping of the initial outlay to produce/develop the boat in the first place. Ball-park figure for designing, producing a plug, making a mold, testing, re-making the plug then producing the production mold? Did you know that a single tank test of a model can be in the region of 5 to 10K….
That's going to be big cost to be spread over an anticipated production run. You can see why there are so many crooks out there who don't want this additional expense in a market that is already being squeezed... God Bless those who go straight and good luck to you... We, the boat buying public, should really support you..but we don’t always because we either don’t know, don’t care or can’t afford to.... then we cry “foul” when we come unstuck…


Support the good guys.. those who pay their way and build a boat properly..a boat we can be safe in…. if it means lowering our sights a little in terms of size and speed… surely that’s what we should be doing?

How do you think the builders would respond to being questioned on what materials they use and what specifications? It would be really handy to have that in writing PRIOR to any sale and not only give you reassurance that it’s safe and sound..but also good, documented evidence in the event of any potential dispute.
__________________
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2008, 17:10   #20
exspyrd trayd membir
 
The Garfish's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Town: inn wiliks hed
Make: Redbay 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Twin Etec 90hp
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono View Post
I have an exquisitely made set of Japanese chisels

nise wan yew nobbur. wen de polis fownd mi stassh ov samewri sords, dats wot i towld dem az wel.

gaRf
__________________
luk arfter numbir wan, downt stepp inn numbir too
The Garfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.