Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 24 March 2016, 11:25   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 41
Tube diameter

More modern inflatable boats appear to have larger tubes than the older boats, especially the small boats. Based on experience here, does it make much difference regarding a dry ride? Some of the boats I have looked at in the circa 3.4m to 4m range have had tube diameters ranging from 38cm to as much as 48cm. I do see the benefit of larger tubes but there must come a point where the internal space is reduced for these smaller boats.

Is there an optimum size for a 4m sib?
__________________

__________________
Arctic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 11:42   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,245
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arctic View Post
More modern inflatable boats appear to have larger tubes than the older boats, especially the small boats. Based on experience here, does it make much difference regarding a dry ride? Some of the boats I have looked at in the circa 3.4m to 4m range have had tube diameters ranging from 38cm to as much as 48cm. I do see the benefit of larger tubes but there must come a point where the internal space is reduced for these smaller boats.

Is there an optimum size for a 4m sib?
my mercury is 48 cm i wouldn't want anything less as i like to sit on the tubes with bent knees at the right height, plus more load carrying capacity with the bigger tube more free-board safer feeling there are some 50 cm too OMO

cheers
__________________

__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 11:57   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 41
Cheers. My last boat had 45cm tubes and those seemed about right.

Do you happen to know the internal dimensions of your boat and, if so, how they are measured? The spec. sheet for my last boat stated an internal width of 84cm but I am not sure if they measure that at deck level or if it is the min. distance between the tubes.
__________________
Arctic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 12:18   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,245
RIBase
here you go cheers
Attached Files
File Type: pdf MERCURY HD 365.pdf (408.8 KB, 71 views)
__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 12:18   #5
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,265
The main reason for this was 4 stroke engines.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 12:56   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 41
Excellent, thanks for that. Now I see the internal width specified is between the tubes as the tube diameters plus the width specified equals the total width. Seems that these type of boats have got wider to allow for the bigger tubes.

That makes sense, 4 strokes are quite heavy, although my latest Suzuki 20hp isn't as bad as they used to be.
__________________
Arctic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 13:00   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: East Anglia
Boat name: Nimrod II
Make: Aerotec 380
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 9.8 2-stroke
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,409
>>>does it make much difference regarding a dry ride?

Yes and to the overall feeling of security out in iffy sea states.
__________________
Fenlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 13:11   #8
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sussex
Boat name: Bombard, Y-162
Make: Aerotec 380, Y-Class
Length: 3m +
Engine: Mercury Mariner 15hp
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,238
All boats differ, eg the Aerotec has a very narrow beam whereas Suzumar boats are big open wide things.....but the bigger tubes are always a better idea in my book
__________________
Max... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 13:32   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 41
Thanks. I will aim for a boat with reasonably sized tubes then. Never had a boat with less than 45cm diameter tubes and, as mentioned, they seemed fine and the ride was as dry as it can be for a SIB I suppose.
__________________
Arctic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 13:36   #10
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Castlebar
Boat name: Clewless
Make: Valiant DR 490
Length: 4m +
Engine: 60 hp ETEC
MMSI: Awaitng one
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,339
RIBase
In My opinion bigger tubes is not allways better. If the boat is fitted with an oversize tubes I believe it will act like a reverse chine and will result in a harsher ride in adverse sea conditions. My Valiant dr 490 has a tube diameter of 0.48 M. I suspect that these are a bit big for the size of the hull but great to sit on.
__________________
two stroke mick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 March 2016, 14:05   #11
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,245
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arctic View Post
Excellent, thanks for that. Now I see the internal width specified is between the tubes as the tube diameters plus the width specified equals the total width. Seems that these type of boats have got wider to allow for the bigger tubes.

That makes sense, 4 strokes are quite heavy, although my latest Suzuki 20hp isn't as bad as they used to be.
OMO but the 800 mm between tubes is just right the 46/8 cm tube is at the right height for sitting without the need to stretch the leg out [29 in inside leg].wet ride their all wet if the winds in your face and the sea state choppy but thats part of it getting the briny on your face.
i know i keep banging on about the Ron hale site but its very good for comparing different boats and engine specs i short listed them printed the specs out juggled the engines and made my choice based on a sib that would take on what i was prepared to go out in form experience of my diving days with an engine make that i trust having had five of them.

good luck with your choice let us know what you decide on
__________________

__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.