Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > Engines & props
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 30 September 2017, 20:28   #1
Member
 
psycho's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Torbay
Boat name: Dont Panic
Make: Zodiac YL 480 DL
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 75
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
What a difference a prop makes....!

Every day is a school day.....

I have been boating since I was knee high to a grasshopper, and have had numerous different boats over the years.

But, every boat that I have owned, have never had to change the prop. It has either had an ally or stainless prop fitted. Just left alone.

I got offered a stainless prop for my rib a while back, at a very good price, so thought why not? give it a go. Got told that I may notice a difference.

Holy crap, what a difference...... Going from ally to stainless is a HUGE difference, especially when you know how your boat normally handles. The hold it now has is brilliant.
__________________
psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 20:40   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by psycho View Post
Going from ally to stainless is a HUGE difference......
I don't doubt you have a big change in performance but it would be unwise to presume it's necessarily the change of material which is responsible for the improvement.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 20:53   #3
Member
 
psycho's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Torbay
Boat name: Dont Panic
Make: Zodiac YL 480 DL
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 75
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Spoke to my marine mechanic, and he says it is. The acceleration has improved, the hold it now has in turns, and no cavitation, is because the stainless is harder and has no flex like the ally has.
__________________
psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 20:54   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Length: 5m +
Engine: 135hp Mercury
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,409
Does the ss prop have the same number of blades & is it of the same pitch as the ally prop that was on it?
__________________
paintman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 21:01   #5
Member
 
psycho's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Torbay
Boat name: Dont Panic
Make: Zodiac YL 480 DL
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 75
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
yes and yes..
__________________
psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 21:04   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Length: 5m +
Engine: 135hp Mercury
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,409
How do the WOT readings compare?
__________________
paintman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 21:08   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: north ayrshire
Boat name: charlie girl
Make: S/R5.4/regal3760
Length: 10m +
Engine: Suzukidf70 2x6lp 315
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwalker View Post
I don't doubt you have a big change in performance but it would be unwise to presume it's necessarily the change of material which is responsible for the improvement.
You will notice that all high performance and race props are stainless
It's not purely the material but the fact it can be worked into better shape and blade profiles
You would expect a performance improvement going from ally to stainless
Think of it like your car having half worn under inflated budget tyres you wouldnt expect it to perform the same as if it were fitted with a good set of properly inflated Bridgestone/ continental Michelin etc
__________________
beamishken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 21:10   #8
Member
 
psycho's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Torbay
Boat name: Dont Panic
Make: Zodiac YL 480 DL
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 75
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Not exactly sure mate, for a couple of reasons.

1. tacho is about as reliable as a Land Rover.....so dont look at it.

2. hardly ever use it flat out as it chine walks a bit, and missus prefers cruising at about 25 knots.

went out the other day, and it is still doing 32 - 36 knots, which is more than enough for us. Mainly used for diving, and or towing toys, and general family fun.
__________________
psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 21:13   #9
Member
 
psycho's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Torbay
Boat name: Dont Panic
Make: Zodiac YL 480 DL
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 75
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by beamishken View Post
You will notice that all high performance and race props are stainless
It's not purely the material but the fact it can be worked into better shape and blade profiles
You would expect a performance improvement going from ally to stainless
Think of it like your car having half worn under inflated budget tyres you wouldnt expect it to perform the same as if it were fitted with a good set of properly inflated Bridgestone/ continental Michelin etc
+1...

The only thing that I can relate it to, a few years ago, after owning my VW T4, for a few years, then having it re-mapped, the difference was brilliant.
__________________
psycho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2017, 23:25   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: London
Boat name: Jeepster
Make: Marina 16 GT
Length: 5m +
Engine: Outboard, Petrol, 30
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 52
The main reason stainless steel props give slightly better performance is because they have thinner blades than Aluminium props. Thinner blades produce less drag, hence they can provide a higher top speed. This is only possible because of the greater strength of S/S over Aluminium. But you will still get cavitation at the blade tips no matter what the prop is made from because all open bladed props produce cavitation. The two trade offs are price and weight...Weight is the enemy of speed and a stainless prop can be twice the weight of a Aluminium prop, negating it's advantages...The cost, often 2-3 times the price of an Aluminium prop, is also extremely expensive, which limits the sales and appeal of stainless props...Most prefer the price and performance compromise of using Aluminium props. One other thing to consider is the damage you can cause to your gearbox if your prop strikes something hard underwater...You might get a chunk taken out of an Aluminium prop in such a case, but your gearbox will suffer no damage...With a stainless prop though the prop is stronger and does not "give" so easily, transferring more energy from a collision to the gearbox, resulting in gearbox failure costing far more to repair than the price of a Aluminium prop.
__________________
jeepster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 October 2017, 07:25   #11
Member
 
Last Tango's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Denny
Boat name: Highland Bluewater
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,647
There's even a difference to be had between one "brand" of stainless and another.
I've replaced a "Vengence" with a "Laser II" and found a big improvement in performance.
WOT was exactly the same but the acceleration with the vented "Laser II" and it's grip when trimmed well out is way better.
__________________
Last Tango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 October 2017, 09:31   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: southampton
Make: ribeye
Length: 6m +
Engine: 140 suzuki
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 337
jeepster Best explanation given on this forum for a long time
__________________
ribber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 October 2017, 10:21   #13
Member
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,888
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by ribber View Post
jeepster Best explanation given on this forum for a long time


If you think that's good, ask him for hints & advice on trailers[emoji6]
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4:Don't feed the troll
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 October 2017, 17:17   #14
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by beamishken View Post
It's not purely the material but the fact it can be worked into better shape and blade profiles
Exactly, that's why it is unwise to presume the increase in performance is the result of the change of material. It is more likely that it is the result of a change of blade characteristics.
Quote:
You would expect a performance improvement going from ally to stainless...
One might, but it isn't a given.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 October 2017, 17:38   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: north ayrshire
Boat name: charlie girl
Make: S/R5.4/regal3760
Length: 10m +
Engine: Suzukidf70 2x6lp 315
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwalker View Post
Exactly, that's why it is unwise to presume the increase in performance is the result of the change of material. It is more likely that it is the result of a change of blade characteristics.
One might, but it isn't a given.
Sorry but I disagree with that statement
Obviously if the blades were identical between an ally prop and a stainless prop you wouldn't see an improvement apart from the influence of the extra weight.
The fact remains a stainless prop correctly specified will always perform better than the best ally prop you will get for a given installation

Therefore is it unwise to assume a stainless prop will perform better?

Safe to assume if someone is going to the expense of buying a stainless prop they will ensure they get the correct one and will see an improvement
__________________
beamishken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 October 2017, 18:32   #16
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Make: HumberOceanOffshore
Length: 8m +
Engine: Volvo KAD300/DPX
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by beamishken View Post
Obviously if the blades were identical between an ally prop and a stainless prop you wouldn't see an improvement apart from the influence of the extra weight.
Exactly, that's my point. It's not the material, it's the prop characteristics which make the primary difference.

It is the case that some of the material sections of stainless props would be too week to replicate satisfactorily in aluminium alloy.
However, it is also the case that there is many stainless steel prop designs which are totally unsuitable for general boating use.

Quote:
Safe to assume if someone is going to the expense of buying a stainless prop they will ensure they get the correct one and will see an improvement
You reckon!? There is plenty of folk who have been disappointed in their stainless prop selection.

There is also plenty of historical discussion about propeller selection on ribnet.
__________________
JW.
jwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 October 2017, 19:11   #17
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,454
RIBase
Steel developments told me to expect around 5% better performance from a SS prop over an Ali one for info.
__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02 October 2017, 21:41   #18
Member
 
Country: Australia
Town: Dalmeny
Make: zodiac
Length: 5m +
Engine: outboard
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Before those who have aluminium props rush out to buy new stainless props there are a heap of variables to consider.

Some makes of stainless and aluminium are both good and bad. The latest aluminium from Yamaha and solas are extremely good, to the point I know people who have gone back to aluminium on their commercial outboards. Outboards that spend much of the time in and out of gear have less pressure from aluminium and also tend to fare better from impact damage that often damages the prop and not the gearbox.

It's rare to fit a stainless of the same size and pitch of aluminium and maintain the same recomended max rpm. If you feel you have a poorly designed underperforming aluminium prop you will most likely need to drop down in pitch if changing over to stainless.

Here (Australia) most manufactures allow an exchange on props untill you get the exact right prop for your needs which makes life far more easier than buying lots of props. If you live close to an outboard dealer they will often allow you to take several props out for testing ( as I do ).
__________________
jonp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.