Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 08 August 2012, 20:43   #21
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: southampton
Make: ribeye
Length: 6m +
Engine: 140 suzuki
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 337
Thank you for finding and posting that link. All now becomes very clear.
Looks like the bathers movements are well researched as to the damage it will cause the beach and swim areas. As always a balance has to be found between humans/nature.
__________________
ribber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 10:47   #22
Member
 
chris.moody's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Daventry & Beaulieu
Boat name: Tigga2
Make: Ribcraft 4.8
Length: 4m +
Engine: Honda BF50
MMSI: 235900806
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 984
RIBase
Article from Practical Boat Owner claiming that EH cannot prohibit anchoring within Osborne Bay Anchoring is allowed in Osborne Bay | News | Pbo
__________________
chris.moody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:43   #23
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Length: 5m +
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 37
A close family member is the Southampton Harbour Master. Though Osbourne Bay is out of his "area" he was ware of them being laid. He is speaking to QHM to fine the reason for them. I have checked the notice to mariners and there is nothing - Queen's Harbour Master - Portsmouth - Local Notices To Mariners

I am sure he will update me when he hears anymore.

Though I feel it’s good to keep our coastlines looking good and healthy, it is somewhat of a shame that this has happened. We are taking our boat over there tonight for a BBQ (on the boat) so will have a look for myself.
__________________
Andy20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:48   #24
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bursledon
Boat name: Mustard
Make: Ribeye 785
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yamaha 200/Merc 6
MMSI: 235068693
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 618
RYA Press Release.

Can I suggest you take a print out of the RYA press Release and anchor within the buoyed area?

It sounds to me as if the RYA is looking for some evidence!
__________________
Tony
JABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:51   #25
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp plus
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by JABS View Post
Can I suggest you take a print out of the RYA press Release and anchor within the buoyed area?

It sounds to me as if the RYA is looking for some evidence!
Go Tony go, you are a bad man
__________________
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:55   #26
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Length: 5m +
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 37
I like the idea and Dad (Soton HM) did say that they dont have any power to remove me, though i really dont want to cause any trouble. I will have a nose around though we often swim to the beach so will maybe have a chat with the chap with a megaphone.

I have many great memories of sitting in the bay i just hope that the area does not become any bigger or become a conservation zone, as this will quickly stop anyone going.
__________________
Andy20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:57   #27
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Sussex
Make: RIBTEC 655
Length: 6m +
Engine: Yam 150
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,160
I can see why they've done it, although I don't agree with it - Osborne Bay is a favourite sheltered spot for PWCs, skiers, ringos and generally anchoring up for a swim and a BBQ - I guess English Heritage want their customers to have a nice quite view out to sea rather than looking at a load of hooligans having a good time and making lots of noise. By making a deal out of it it's only going to encourage more people to anchor there.

I don't believe the environmental rubbish, we're destroying our sea beds all over the UK and there are many more that are far more important than Osborne Bay which don't have any protection.
__________________
thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 12:59   #28
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bursledon
Boat name: Mustard
Make: Ribeye 785
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yamaha 200/Merc 6
MMSI: 235068693
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 618
I don't think it's a question of causing trouble.

EH are using the thin edge of the wedge approach to discourage anchoring and they don't have the right.

I intend to go over August bank holiday and stay overnight!
__________________
Tony
JABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 13:05   #29
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Length: 5m +
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomas View Post
I can see why they've done it, although I don't agree with it - Osborne Bay is a favourite sheltered spot for PWCs, skiers, ringos and generally anchoring up for a swim and a BBQ - I guess English Heritage want their customers to have a nice quite view out to sea rather than looking at a load of hooligans having a good time and making lots of noise. By making a deal out of it it's only going to encourage more people to anchor there.

I don't believe the environmental rubbish, we're destroying our sea beds all over the UK and there are many more that are far more important than Osborne Bay which don't have any protection.
Personally i dont mind dropping anchor a little further out in the bay, if it ment that the swimers had a safe enviroment to use the beach and if that was the only reason. But to be fair i havent seen the size or location of the marked off area. The thing i would not be keen on is EH making the area bigger and bigger, untill there was no space at all. It sounds to me like they havent actually asked/informed the propper people anyway.
__________________
Andy20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 17:23   #30
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: hampshire
Length: 7m +
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 353
as far as i am aware, private property (which is what this is) only own down to the low water mark. Is this correct?
__________________
wellhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 22:12   #31
Member
 
m chappelow's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: yorkshire
Boat name: little vicky
Make: avon ex RNLI
Length: 3m +
Engine: tohatsu
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellhouse
as far as i am aware, private property (which is what this is) only own down to the low water mark. Is this correct?
There used to be some old ancient thing in some northern areas of England about ,,, it was only private where a man can ride out to sea on horse back and stick a spear in the sea bed at the lowest tide of the year , beyond that it belongs to the crown ,
Doubt if it still stands lol
__________________
m chappelow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 August 2012, 22:58   #32
SPR
Member
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Central Belt of Scotland
Boat name: Puddleduck III
Make: Bombard
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,066
in Scotland - our Harbour Trust owns the water from a beacon to light house - this none tidal and they have bye laws that cover that area too.

The land was donated by The local land owner to The trust in the 60's I believe.

S.
__________________
SPRmarine / SPRtraining
RYA Training Courses & Safety Equipment Sales
SPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2012, 14:25   #33
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Make: extreme 24
Length: 7m +
Engine: merc 6.2 320hp
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 709
RYA: No anchoring restrictions in Osborne Bay | Motor Boat News | MBY
__________________
Carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2012, 16:27   #34
Member
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,883
RIBase

Apart from protecting our interests, informing us of our rights, introducing internationally recognised boating qualifications.....What has the RYA ever done for us comrades?
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4:Don't feed the troll
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2012, 19:48   #35
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Jersey
Boat name: Bete Noire
Make: Humber Assault 5m
Length: 5m +
Engine: Mariner 50hp
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy20 View Post
?..But to be fair i havent seen the size or location of the marked off area...


It is roughly an area 400 yards by 300 yards directly in front of the beach.
__________________
L'escargot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2012, 19:59   #36
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp plus
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,072
Interesting as that is the area many boats regularly moored.
__________________
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2012, 20:06   #37
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Jersey
Boat name: Bete Noire
Make: Humber Assault 5m
Length: 5m +
Engine: Mariner 50hp
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 RIBS View Post
Interesting as that is the area many boats regularly moored.
If you look on Google Earth there are actually very few anchored in that area, most are anchored further out.
__________________
L'escargot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2012, 09:03   #38
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Portsmouth
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
QHM Portsmouth have released a Local Notice to Mariners stating the marker buoy's as TEMPORARY MARKER BUOYS

Queen's Harbour Master - Portsmouth - Local Notices To Mariners
__________________
PhillipJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2012, 14:18   #39
DGR
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Barmouth
Boat name: Blue Marlin
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 7m +
Engine: Yanmar 315/Bravo 2X
MMSI: 235020218
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 827
... not terribly helpful of QHM - he could have indicated what they were supposed to be for - and could have pointed out that you shouldn't use them for mooring - which is what they get used for around here (usually quite briefly)!!

__________________
DGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2012, 17:50   #40
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp plus
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,072
RYA challenging these buoys

RYA challenges claimed anchoring ban in Osborne Bay | News | News & Events | RYA
__________________
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.