Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 22 March 2009, 12:08   #11
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Boat name: Gemineye
Make: Ribeye S850 charter
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp
MMSI: 235097445
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,029
Just been reading that the emergency services had lifejacket shortages, is this true?

I know the southern emergency services have well equipped and trained crews from RNLI, FIRE AND POLICE inflatable boats as well as some very good volunteer teams. Does Scotland have none similar for insure work?
__________________
Ian
Rib charter and Rib hire with www.c2ribs.co.uk
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2009, 12:37   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Inverness
Boat name: none
Make: none
Length: 5m +
Engine: none
MMSI: none
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,908
Time and distance are the enemy. Renfrew fire station where the boat is based is about two hours from Loch Awe, even if they were hitched up ready to go when the call came.
__________________

__________________
BruceB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2009, 12:45   #13
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Boat name: Gemineye
Make: Ribeye S850 charter
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp
MMSI: 235097445
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceB View Post
Time and distance are the enemy. Renfrew fire station where the boat is based is about two hours from Loch Awe, even if they were hitched up ready to go when the call came.
Agree, any news on equipment shortages?
__________________
Ian
Rib charter and Rib hire with www.c2ribs.co.uk
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2009, 13:16   #14
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 RIBS View Post
Agree, any news on equipment shortages?
The crew at Renfrew are well equipped with modern boats, drysuits etc. They can be seen training from time to time on Loch Lomond. I think any reference you saw to equipment shortage would be that the local fire crew probably didn't have access to any water rescue kit (and may not be trained in that area of work).
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 17:50   #15
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
MAIB Preliminary Examination...

The MAIB have decided only to perform a Preliminary Examination in this case.
Quote:
Synopsis
A group of friends were on a camping and angling trip near Dalmally on Loch Awe. They had set up camp and decided to use their small boat to visit a pub on the opposite shore. After spending some time in the pub, they attempted to use the boat to return to their campsite. Thick fog had developed and at 0300, a member of the party who had stayed at the campsite woke and heard calls for help from the Loch. He attempted to guide his friends back to the shore by lighting fires and using lights from their vehicles, which were parked nearby. This was not successful and he called the Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) for assistance.
The FRS alerted other emergency services and Police, FRS, Ambulance and Coastguard Rescue Teams attended. A Search and Rescue Helicopter was scrambled, but thick fog prevented it from getting close to the Loch. An FRS water rescue unit was called for and, on arrival at the Loch, searched for and recovered two casualties from the water. Despite the efforts of medical teams, they could not be revived. The two other men and the boat could not be found.
There is not enough information to be certain what caused this accident. It is likely that the boat was relatively small and that it was overloaded by carrying four passengers, an outboard engine and a fuel tank. Navigating the boat back across the Loch would have been extremely difficult in the thick fog.
Action taken:
MAIB has investigated many accidents where alcohol has been a contributory factor, and this case emphasises the increased risks of attempting to operate a boat under the influence of alcohol. It is unlikely that any new lessons can be learned from this accident.
There has been some controversy in the Scottish press about the delay in bringing a rescue boat from Renfrew. I am surprised that the MAIB don't think that consideration of how rescue on inland water is organised is a matter worthy of further investigation and discussion.


The press reports at the time all said the guys were not drunk and had very little to drink in the pub. Yet the MAIB draws the conclusion that "this case emphasises the increased risks of attempting to operate a boat under the influence of alcohol." Glad to see that they are providing a logical argument to justify their findings, as ever!
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 18:03   #16
K&S
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: Riberty
Make: xs 650
Length: 6m +
Engine: suzuki 175
MMSI: 235063328
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polwart View Post
I am surprised that the MAIB don't think that consideration of how rescue on inland water is organised is a matter worthy of further investigation and discussion.
I attended a conference several years ago which looked at dealling with the safety cover provided on Loch Lomond. It was pretty disjointed esp the fire service cover, this was before they became involved in water safety cover i should add.
I would agree that unless things have changed not just on Loch Lomond then perhaps there is scope for investigation.
__________________
K&S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 18:23   #17
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by K&S View Post
I attended a conference several years ago which looked at dealling with the safety cover provided on Loch Lomond. It was pretty disjointed esp the fire service cover, this was before they became involved in water safety cover i should add.
I would agree that unless things have changed not just on Loch Lomond then perhaps there is scope for investigation.
My understanding is that legally the fire service has no obligation to provide inland water rescue (but does in floods) and that technically the police are responsible - but the fire service do what they can. This is why it is Strathclyde and Central police forces which provide the grant support for the Lus rescue boat.

The problem of course is that there are so many inland loch's in Scotland that covering them all with short response times would be impractical. Sods law says wherever you put a boat it will be in the wrong place; although there may be an argument that Loch Awe justifies some sort of rescue cover - and I believe there is a local "campaign" on to get a volunteer crewed boat.

Actually there is a case that some of the attraction of the "remoteness" in Scotland would be lost if there were rescue boats here there and everywhere. You need to be self reliant - to my mind that creates an extra degree of adventure - otherwise we might as well all go to Loch Lomond.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 18:34   #18
K&S
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: Riberty
Make: xs 650
Length: 6m +
Engine: suzuki 175
MMSI: 235063328
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 377
One problem that was highlighted at the conference was if your boat caught fire in a certain area then there would be a squable regarding who's responsibility it would be. I'm sure the matter has been cleared up by now...

The Fire service is now a rescue service and i would imagine that does include inland water.
i Know they have done the training. What they don't want to do is interfere with the sea side of things as that is coast guard / rnli .

I'm sure there are others better qualified to say exactliy what they are responsible for.
__________________
K&S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 18:40   #19
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Inverness
Boat name: none
Make: none
Length: 5m +
Engine: none
MMSI: none
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,908
There has been a fair amount of controversy and a paper led campaign to provide a safety boat on Loch Awe since the incident.
There has also been a lot of misinformation about response times etc depending on whether you are for or against providing a boat.
Even with the latest incident you are still much much more likely to be killed driving to Loch Awe than in a boat floating on it.
Without first hand information from the people involved I would take most of the information being bandied around with a pinch of salt, even the "official" information as it is mainly coloured by the various agendas.
I can state with confidence that stations in Argyll are in the main not trained for water rescue, hence the boat from Renfrew. However even stationing a boat in Loch Awe still means it can be up to 25 miles away from an incident as the loch is around this length.
__________________
BruceB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2009, 19:02   #20
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by K&S
One problem that was highlighted at the conference was if your boat caught fire in a certain area then there would be a squable regarding who's responsibility it would be. I'm sure the matter has been cleared up by now...

The Fire service is now a rescue service and i would imagine that does include inland water.
i Know they have done the training. What they don't want to do is interfere with the sea side of things as that is coast guard / rnli .

I'm sure there are others better qualified to say exactliy what they are responsible for.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/...st/7998331.stm
http://www.safe-tay.co.uk/content/view/20/35/
http://www.mcga.gov.uk/c4mca/uksar.pdf (see s4.2 on p10, and 6.1 and 6.2 on p12).

Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceB View Post
There has been a fair amount of controversy and a paper led campaign to provide a safety boat on Loch Awe since the incident.
There has also been a lot of misinformation about response times etc depending on whether you are for or against providing a boat.
Even with the latest incident you are still much much more likely to be killed driving to Loch Awe than in a boat floating on it.
Without first hand information from the people involved I would take most of the information being bandied around with a pinch of salt, even the "official" information as it is mainly coloured by the various agendas.
Which is why I would have thought a supposedly independent investigation would have been justified.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.