Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 22 October 2006, 16:18   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,194
solent 585 /600 or Ribcraft 585??

have narrowed it down ..which is a better boat, ??
__________________

__________________
matt h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2006, 16:19   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,194
its for general use and wavejumping and cruising< will probally be a Suzuki 115 or 140 subject to deal<<
__________________

__________________
matt h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2006, 16:27   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Midlands
Make: Nautique
Length: 6m +
Engine: PCM 5.7l
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,082
Prefer the Solent when you can open it up and get over the top of the waves, faster with the same engine too.

Ribcraft more suited than the Solent for swells rough enough that you cant keep up planing speed. Higher bow sheer, deeper V at the stern.
Standard of fitout on a Ribcraft is usually brilliant too, but you have to pay a premium for it.

H
__________________
simmons0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2006, 17:10   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Mighty Penryn
Boat name: Little Joe.
Make: Avon Searider
Length: 4m +
Engine: Honda BF50
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,841
Why are you excluding an Osprey Vipermax 585? It's easily as capable as either the Solent or the RC. I'm very well acquainted with the RC 585 as I spend most of my time on the water along side one. The Osprey, if well arranged, is also a better looking outfit.
__________________
Mollers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2006, 18:05   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Aylesbury/Lymington
Boat name: Farfetched
Make: Solent
Length: 6m +
Engine: 150hp Optimax
MMSI: 235021048
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 859
I disagree with Mollers on looks. I find the lighter Solent great fun and never feel insecure....
__________________
brucehawsker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2006, 18:22   #6
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: Oakley
Boat name: Zerstörer
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Suzuki DF 140
MMSI: 235050131
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,931
okay,

On the Ribcraft front from my limited experience its a proper RIB. I was out yesterday playing in the Harbour swell with the wind blowing on to a receeding tide and I enjoyed it, that was at Langston. It had a massive ebb tide running. Then it was a case of hammering over the choppy Solent once I got out to sea. I'm just trying to be objective here but if your playing diiferent RIBS off against each other you really need to take them out on a test drive on the same day or a similar day then make your mind up.

Personally I think the the human will give up before the RIBCRAFT. Yesterday I was playing around in the entrance to Langstone with the tide going out but the wind blowing straight on. It was scary when going straight in to the waves but it showed what the boat could do. It was even scarier when I saw the local Lifebaot sat on the ramp ready to launch.
I don't have any experience of the Solent boat but I can vouch for the RIBCRAFT. Its a good boat. And does what RIBS are supposed to do. I don't think RIBS are for all out and out speed. I see them as seaworthy boats. Speed with survivability. thats my moto. If I wanted out and out speed I'd buy a speed boat.
__________________
http://www.xfire.com/download/
Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2006, 14:01   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,194
thank you chaps, tell you what , its a tough call, basically you have in that class (6m) alot of choice, i want to order but im hesitating as i dont want to make the wrong puchase,, value for money is paramount, what about the Tohatsu 6.1 one design with on one of their new 115 TLDI, reallt affordable ribs££ or one to avoid??
HELP !!!
__________________
matt h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2006, 07:39   #8
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Midlands
Make: Nautique
Length: 6m +
Engine: PCM 5.7l
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,082
Tohatsu/Solents are more or less the same boat just build by different people.
Both will be fast, light and well built. The difference is in the fit out. Have a look at both factories, see some recent boats and decide which one suits you and which you think is the better quality fit out.

A 115 will be a nice rig, the Tohatsu 140 would be a blast though!

Harry
__________________
simmons0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2006, 18:21   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: West Wales
Make: Vipermax 5.8, SR4.7
Length: 5m +
Engine: 150 Opti, F50EFi
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,298
I took a look at a Tohatsu RIB at the Southampton show - what a pile of shite. I have seen a couple of Solents and the difference in build quality is vast. Whoever prepares the moulds for the Tohatsu boats needs to think about a quick change of career. Having seen what was on show, I wouldn't go near one.
__________________
Downhilldai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2006, 19:02   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Bristol
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,194
really ?? are they that bad,, i wish i was around to see them ,, couldnt make the show,,i had a Humber that was pretty awfull !!
__________________

__________________
matt h is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.