Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 06 July 2016, 18:00   #1
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Chicago
Make: N/A
Length: no boat
Engine: N/A
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 75
Need Help Deciding on What RIB to Purchase, and How to Outfit It

Hey all,

I decided to sell my Cadet 350 and Mercury 15 motor, the pain of re-assembling and disassembling the boat every time was too much of a hassle.

Given that, I'm keen on upgrading to a RIB before next summer hits. I'm hoping for knowledgeable suggestions on what I should be looking for.

When it comes right down to it, I want a boat that's going to have sporty performance characteristics and be a blast to run around in. Moderately fast (40mph+), nimble, and sturdy/stable are what I'm after.

As far as size, I think around 5 to 5.5 meters is the sweet spot. I'd like to be able to comfortably seat at least 4-5 adults (including the Captain).

My research thusfar has led me to be seriously looking at the Zodiac Bayrunner series. What concerns me about these boats are the seats, especially on the 550 which lacks the handholds, they just don't appear to be "secure" feeling at higher speeds on choppy waters. Granted, I could have a bare hull outfitted to a similar layout with better seats, but I wouldn't have a clue as to what would fit or look/feel superior to the stock seats. What would be super-nice is a bench seat at the helm which could switch between being a seat, and a nice bolster for stand-up operation.

Another concern about the Bayrunner is how to power it. The Mercury 75, 90, and 115 HP four-strokes all weigh the same and use the exact same chassis. I know that if I bought a 500 hull I would really want to power it with a 90 (20HP over the 70HP stated), and the 550 with a 115HP (25HP over stated). Would slightly "overpowering" the boat in this manner create a significant structural integrity risk? I'm not certain if the stated HP is determined by what Zodiac thinks a given outboard weighs so that it doesn't overload the transom, or by some function of how much power they deem is "safe".

Anyway, knowledgeable input from experienced RIB operators is more than welcome
__________________
kestrel452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 July 2016, 20:40   #2
Member
 
idsebby's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Town: WAterford
Boat name: na
Make: Rimini
Length: 5m +
Engine: dt85
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 237
I suppose it's not just based on weight. The power is the killer, think of the outboard as a lever/ fulcrum. The more power you put behind that lever the more strain on the transom. Kinda like pulling nails with a hammer.
I could be very wrong I suppose someone else knows better.
__________________
idsebby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 01:40   #3
Member
 
cgoing's Avatar
 
Country: USA
Town: Connecticut
Make: Zodiac
Length: 6m +
Engine: Undecided
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 777
Well for a start Yamaha and zodiac have done performance testing on these models. That can be found on the Yamaha outboard website under owner resources. That will give you an idea of the speeds with the power packages that Zodiac offers them with. Second the HP ratings are not determined by the manufacturers alone unless it is a boat that is not built to coast guard or National marine manufacturers standards. This is why you see simiLar horsepower ratings on similar sized boats between brands such as Zodiac, Novurania, and AB.
Overloading in many cases is not only dangerous but highly illegal and in some states the fines are outrageous. I know someone who learned the hard way.
__________________
Chris Going
DinghyPro
dinghyproct@gmail.com
www.DinghyPro.net
cgoing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 07:12   #4
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrel452 View Post
... Moderately fast (40mph+), nimble, and sturdy/stable are what I'm after...

...My research thusfar has led me to be seriously looking at the Zodiac Bayrunner series...

...What concerns me about these boats are the seats, especially on the 550 which lacks the handholds, they just don't appear to be "secure" feeling at higher speeds on choppy waters...

... I know that if I bought a 500 hull I would really want to power it with a 90 (20HP over the 70HP stated), and the 550 with a 115HP (25HP over stated). Would slightly "overpowering" the boat in this manner create a significant structural integrity risk?...
If you want to run a fast rib in chop with passengers then I think sideways facing bench seats at the front are probably the worst possible design.



There's no way I'd be sitting on there at 40 knots.

I've no idea why you'd want to overpower it before you've even tried it, giving you warranty issues. Zodiac know that HP is not = weight.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 07:51   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Leicester
Length: 5m +
Engine: 135hp Mercury
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,408
Boat manufacturers usually give a maximum recommended engine size.
Seeing that you are in the land of the litigator if you exceed that recommendation & have an incident I could see your insurers - if you find one that will take it on in the first place - dumping you in a hurry & leaving you to foot the bill.
__________________
paintman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 12:00   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,441
RIBase
stick a 90 on 5.5 you'll get 40 + mph set up properly in flat conditions if its rough your arse will tell you to slow down before your brain does
__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 12:20   #7
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
The Bayrunner 550 with a Mercury 90hp is a 48 mph boat...it's a little faster than the Yamaha thanks to the displacement. If you want to squeeze out a little more horsepower, the Pro Open 550 is rated for a 115. It's a stiffer hull layout with bigger tubes though.

HP rating is determined by the size of the boat as well as the whether or not the boat can maneuver safely at top speed. Tube size has a lot to do with it, since the tubes are the heart of the boat's buoyancy. With a larger tube diameter, the end cones are bigger, which means more buoyancy around the stern.

The Bayrunnner is exactly that...it's designed to run around a bay. Sure, you can take it out in the rougher stuff, but it really is not designed for it.

The models that are more "offshore" oriented are the RecPros and the Pro Opens.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 12:50   #8
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Chicago
Make: N/A
Length: no boat
Engine: N/A
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 75
I hear all of you on the overpower aspect, most mechanics I called yesterday to ask if they thought it'd pose an issue said they wouldn't rig anything above what the plate said anyway. They wouldn't even put a Merc 75 (only 5 horses over), which is disappointing since Mercury doesn't make a 70 and they're what most shops service around here.

What's the top speed difference between a Bayrunner 500 and 550 when rigged to the max stated HP? From what people are saying in this thread, and what dealers have told me as well, the 550 should be doing 40-45mph. Does anyone have a decent idea of what speed the 500 will run at with a 70HP engine on the back?

What Poly said about the benches being poorly laid out for faster cruising is exactly what worried me in the first place about the 550. My presumption is it's a slightly faster craft than the 500, but what's the point of paying the extra over the 500 if the 550 is going to be much less secure feeling at speed? Does anyone possibly have suggestions on how to custom outfit a 550 hull seating-wise to make higher speed operation more comfortable, and with what seats?
__________________
kestrel452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 13:01   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,441
RIBase
shock-mitigation seats are the way to go jockey seats as a minimum if you want to tear around or standing with a bolster seat adjustable back rest.but shock seats are great
__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 13:02   #10
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrel452 View Post
I hear all of you on the overpower aspect, most mechanics I called yesterday to ask if they thought it'd pose an issue said they wouldn't rig anything above what the plate said anyway. They wouldn't even put a Merc 75 (only 5 horses over), which is disappointing since Mercury doesn't make a 70 and they're what most shops service around here.

What's the top speed difference between a Bayrunner 500 and 550 when rigged to the max stated HP? From what people are saying in this thread, and what dealers have told me as well, the 550 should be doing 40-45mph. Does anyone have a decent idea of what speed the 500 will run at with a 70HP engine on the back?

What Poly said about the benches being poorly laid out for faster cruising is exactly what worried me in the first place about the 550. My presumption is it's a slightly faster craft than the 500, but what's the point of paying the extra over the 500 if the 550 is going to be much less secure feeling at speed? Does anyone possibly have suggestions on how to custom outfit a 550 hull seating-wise to make higher speed operation more comfortable, and with what seats?
The 550 has a large integral fuel tank.
The 500 does not (you'll have to use a big red portable fuel tank).
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 13:03   #11
Member
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,864
RIBase
Why the obsession with top speed? Boats are always a compromise, your pursuit of top speed at this level of boating, will inevitably compromise handling further down the speed range. Unless you're fortunate enough to be cursedblessed with permanent flat calm waters, the times when you can run flat out will be far and few between. Many would argue that RIBs are at their best when it's lumpy & challenging, that's when you need control & holeshot, not top end. If all you want is speed, you're looking at the wrong kind of boat. IMHO of course😏


Lions led by donkeys
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4:Don't feed the troll
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 13:17   #12
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikey Dave View Post
Why the obsession with top speed? Boats are always a compromise, your pursuit of top speed at this level of boating, will inevitably compromise handling further down the speed range. Unless you're fortunate enough to be cursedblessed with permanent flat calm waters, the times when you can run flat out will be far and few between. Many would argue that RIBs are at their best when it's lumpy & challenging, that's when you need control & holeshot, not top end. If all you want is speed, you're looking at the wrong kind of boat. IMHO of course😏


Lions led by donkeys
He's on the Great Lakes on the Chicago side.

It's pretty flat most of the time, but it can get really nasty in less than an hour.

Lake Michigan, I've started a dive with glassy water conditions (seriously, 0-2 mph wind, no waves at all), then an hour later, surfaced in 1 meter swells. The wave ratio is quite high too, they're not slow rollers...they're fast, choppy swells.

RIBs are great for top speed, thanks to their power to weight ratio... less GRP = more speed per hp!
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 15:38   #13
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Chicago
Make: N/A
Length: no boat
Engine: N/A
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikey Dave View Post
Why the obsession with top speed? Boats are always a compromise, your pursuit of top speed at this level of boating, will inevitably compromise handling further down the speed range. Unless you're fortunate enough to be cursedblessed with permanent flat calm waters, the times when you can run flat out will be far and few between. Many would argue that RIBs are at their best when it's lumpy & challenging, that's when you need control & holeshot, not top end. If all you want is speed, you're looking at the wrong kind of boat. IMHO of course��


Lions led by donkeys
Basically, I am trying to see if the higher cost of a 550 hull is justified. Top end isn't the only thing I'm worried about when it comes to performance, acceleration and maneuverability are just as important in my eyes. Maybe it's ill advised of me to try and gauge overall performance characteristics by comparing top speed, but what else can you really try to slice and dice between the two numbers-wise?

No one seems to really know what a Bayrunner 500 with a 70 horse motor on the back will do. A dealer told me I shouldnt expect speeds higher than what US Boat Test saw on theirs with only a 50 horse (37mph), which is confusing given that it would be a 40% increase in power...

The thing keeping me from getting a pre-outfitted 550 is the seating, it just doesn't look that great for "sport cruising" as Zodiac puts it. I was just hoping someone knew how I could outfit a 550 hull so that it'd be a more comfortable craft for speeding around in. I also don't know if I can get the overall length of a 550 on a trailer to be under 20 feet even with the addition of a trailer tongue hinge, having to rent a 30' long storage bay is far more expensive than a 20'
__________________
kestrel452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 July 2016, 18:17   #14
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrel452 View Post
The thing keeping me from getting a pre-outfitted 550 is the seating, it just doesn't look that great for "sport cruising" as Zodiac puts it. I was just hoping someone knew how I could outfit a 550 hull so that it'd be a more comfortable craft for speeding around in. I also don't know if I can get the overall length of a 550 on a trailer to be under 20 feet even with the addition of a trailer tongue hinge, having to rent a 30' long storage bay is far more expensive than a 20'
You know, Zodiac offers multiple seat configurations of those boats... You could order it with a factory installed jockey console or a stand up console with a bolster if you wanted.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 July 2016, 11:39   #15
Member
 
cgoing's Avatar
 
Country: USA
Town: Connecticut
Make: Zodiac
Length: 6m +
Engine: Undecided
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 777
Defender has the Zodiac Pro 550's in numerous configurations on their website. They generally have a good selection in stock also.
__________________
Chris Going
DinghyPro
dinghyproct@gmail.com
www.DinghyPro.net
cgoing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2016, 03:33   #16
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Chicago
Make: N/A
Length: no boat
Engine: N/A
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poly View Post
If you want to run a fast rib in chop with passengers then I think sideways facing bench seats at the front are probably the worst possible design.

There's no way I'd be sitting on there at 40 knots.

I've no idea why you'd want to overpower it before you've even tried it, giving you warranty issues. Zodiac know that HP is not = weight.
I'm over the over-powering prospect, no mechanic would do it, boat it plenty fast enough anyway.

I'm curious though, what would you do for seating up front then? A forward facing bench? Two bucket seats? Whatever it may be, it must: provide ample seating for two adults, be secure feeling enough for 40-45mph operation, and not take up so much space that the bow becomes cramped. This may be a tall order, but getting the 550 over the 500 would be pointless IMHO unless I can figure some great solution for forward seating.
__________________
kestrel452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2016, 03:37   #17
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Chicago
Make: N/A
Length: no boat
Engine: N/A
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgoing View Post
Defender has the Zodiac Pro 550's in numerous configurations on their website. They generally have a good selection in stock also.
I'm not really a fan of Zodiac's Touring or Classic Pro setups, which are the two non-Bayrunner choices. The Touring is like having a jet-ski seat behind a center console, I just don't get it. And the classic has just one seat.
__________________
kestrel452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2016, 12:25   #18
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by kestrel452 View Post
I'm not really a fan of Zodiac's Touring or Classic Pro setups, which are the two non-Bayrunner choices. The Touring is like having a jet-ski seat behind a center console, I just don't get it. And the classic has just one seat.
Pro Open 550? Different boat, but it'll give you the seating you're looking for.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2016, 12:40   #19
Member
 
cgoing's Avatar
 
Country: USA
Town: Connecticut
Make: Zodiac
Length: 6m +
Engine: Undecided
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 777
The jockey style seating (jet ski) is very popular among sailing coaches as they are centered and can easily reach either side of the boat if need be. At the same point it can comfortably run standing up while straddling that seat.

Nothing says you have to use a factory or dealer set up either. Since the seats and consoles are bolted in your layout choices are wide open. That is one of the reasons why Zodiac had sold so many Pro model boats over the years.
__________________
Chris Going
DinghyPro
dinghyproct@gmail.com
www.DinghyPro.net
cgoing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rib

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.