Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 18 May 2017, 04:07   #1
SPR
Trade member
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Central Belt of Scotland
Boat name: Puddleduck III
Make: Bombard
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,066
MAIB Report - 2 RIBS Collide - Power Turns

Hi All,

Just released today:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/o...lyer-published

and Flyer:

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...y-on-rib-tours

regards

S.
__________________
SPRmarine / SPRtraining
RYA Training Courses & Safety Equipment Sales
SPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 04:30   #2
Member
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Wild West
Boat name: No Boat
Make: No Boat
Length: under 3m
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,692
Send a message via AIM to Maximus
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPR View Post
Looks like we're in someone's Sights... again!
...You can make all the regs and safety measure rules you like.....you'll never never ever overcome Human incompetence and/or low IQ!...Fact.
__________________

__________________
A clever Man learns by his mistakes..
A Wise Man learns by other people's!

The Road to HELL ..is Paved with "Good inventions!"
Maximus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 05:07   #3
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus View Post
Looks like we're in someone's Sights... again!

...You can make all the regs and safety measure rules you like.....you'll never never ever overcome Human incompetence and/or low IQ!...Fact.


I've only skimmed the flyer - but the maib do seem to be considering that - rather than sea with the actual cause of the incident (skippers crashing into each other whilst intentionally doing right turns) they are proposing that paying passengers shouldn't be sitting on the tubes where they are likely to get hit in a collision. i.e. They should assume the humans get it wrong and use the design to protect as much as possible.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 06:18   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Nottingham
Boat name: Treliska
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 6m +
Engine: Outboard 225 Optimax
MMSI: 232009522
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 236
RIBase
There has been a longstanding trend (and I think we all knew what was coming) towards a regulation change that you can only code a vessel for the number of seats you have. In many way's it is sensible although I'm not sure how the commercial dive RIBs will get on...

What worries me about this is that of the 7 recommendations 4 are about RIB seating when in fact the injury could (and probably would) have occurred if the person hit had been in a proper seat. Normally the MAIB reports read very sensibly but this seems lie they have taken it as an opportunity to advance on objective unrelated to the main cause of the incident.

What to me seems far more important is that 2 very experienced commercial skippers didn't appear to realise that driving theirs boats head on at each other constitutes at least a moderately risky operation and they should probably work out ahead of time how to avoid hitting each other...
__________________
Andy_Rs600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 07:04   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: West Sussex
Boat name: Grey Mist
Make: Parker 800 Baltic
Length: 8m +
Engine: 2xMercury Diesel 170
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,824
RIBase
For sure interesting reading not only for other operators but also for the manufactures of seasafari type ribs and MCA approved surveyors . As Andy_Rs600 has pointed out there are number of seating recommendations a one of which is that a grab handle should be at least at chest height. This was also mentioned in the Cardiff incident MIAB report . At the time when this was brought up on RibNet and this was a good few years ago I even mentioned that Parker had a similar incident in Poland and they then introduced as standard high grab handles for the forward passengers, see attached photo

I am yet to see a UK built seasafari rib with high grab handles for the forward seated passengers . Here I would also blame the MCA approved surveyor for not ensuring these are fitted. I know there is no regulation as yet only recommendation for such but nevertheless why not comply . I agree that if a rib is coded for 12 passengers these should be seated on jockey or bench seats only . The operator here bought a cheaper version seasafari rib and still got it coded for 12 passengers. This is for sure wrong.

By the way in Portugal the commercial ribs can carry 18 passengers and as we know Portugal is in the EC
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0936.jpg
Views:	188
Size:	73.7 KB
ID:	119544  
__________________
Andre
Andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 07:31   #6
Member
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Wild West
Boat name: No Boat
Make: No Boat
Length: under 3m
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,692
Send a message via AIM to Maximus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poly View Post
I've only skimmed the flyer - but the maib do seem to be considering that - rather than sea with the actual cause of the incident (skippers crashing into each other whilst intentionally doing right turns) they are proposing that paying passengers shouldn't be sitting on the tubes where they are likely to get hit in a collision. i.e. They should assume the humans get it wrong and use the design to protect as much as possible.
Design and engineering with safety in mind is ofcourse always to be welcomed...
But Two large Heavy RIBs...(or whatever!) full of Holiday maker/passengers colliding at speed is always going to do people Damage!
Using proper and really PUNATIVE penalties under PRESENT legislation for this type of Behaviour...and the subsequent publicity) would do a lot more to Curtail avoidable accidents like the one we are discussing...and be A LOT more immediate!

I suspect it'll be more recommendations...more Red Tape and more cost as usuall...with little or no effect on the Feclkless Drivers/company's who are REALLY to Blame.
These incidents also have the potential to shine a light on the Liesure RIB user..with unknown consequences long term.
__________________
A clever Man learns by his mistakes..
A Wise Man learns by other people's!

The Road to HELL ..is Paved with "Good inventions!"
Maximus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 08:03   #7
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre View Post
I am yet to see a UK built seasafari rib with high grab handles for the forward seated passengers .
Emm... I take it you didn't look at he pictures of the two ribs involved then (both Humbers made in the UK). Both have a rail in front of the front seat.

Quote:
Here I would also blame the MCA approved surveyor for not ensuring these are fitted. I know there is no regulation as yet only recommendation for such but nevertheless why not comply
So you are criticising the MCA surveyor for only applying the rules as they stand and not making them up as they go along?

Quote:
I agree that if a rib is coded for 12 passengers these should be seated on jockey or bench seats only . This is for sure wrong.
I understand why you say that but consider: if I want to code a dive rib that will take 8 divers 1 mile off shore, driven responsibly at 25 knots max, and never in really silly conditions because divers won't be recreational diving in those, and I'm not doing silly tricks or aiming to excite/scare my pax, why would I need to buy a massive rib that have jockeys for all (especially if the same divers can go out in their club rib the next weekend sitting on the tubes).

The same coding rules apply to all sorts of boats used for all sorts of things. e.g. this little ferry http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4VT_V5rAZx...Islands+09.JPG
Just as the coding doesn't apply to any sports done from the boat, e.g. water skiing, diving etc I'm not convinced it should really apply to extreme uses an operator decides to put a vessel to. Now if it is being used as a thrill ride then maybe it should have to comply to the same standards as roller coasters etc!
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 08:15   #8
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus View Post
Using proper and really PUNATIVE penalties under PRESENT legislation for this type of Behaviour...and the subsequent publicity) would do a lot more to Curtail avoidable accidents like the one we are discussing...and be A LOT more immediate!
make up your mind:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus View Post
...You can make all the regs and safety measure rules you like.....you'll never never ever overcome Human incompetence and/or low IQ!...Fact.


The MAIB are not there to prosecute though - they are there to make recommendations to avoid future accidents. The choice of prosecution will rest with Procurator Fiscal based on any report from the MCA. The MAIB report doesn't mean there won't be a prosecution (that may even be why there is surprisingly little said about the human errors involved).
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 08:42   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: West Sussex
Boat name: Grey Mist
Make: Parker 800 Baltic
Length: 8m +
Engine: 2xMercury Diesel 170
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,824
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poly View Post
Emm... I take it you didn't look at he pictures of the two ribs involved then (both Humbers made in the UK). Both have a rail in front of the front seat.

So you are criticising the MCA surveyor for only applying the rules as they stand and not making them up as they go along?

I understand why you say that but consider: if I want to code a dive rib that will take 8 divers 1 mile off shore, driven responsibly at 25 knots max, and never in really silly conditions because divers won't be recreational diving in those, and I'm not doing silly tricks or aiming to excite/scare my pax, why would I need to buy a massive rib that have jockeys for all (especially if the same divers can go out in their club rib the next weekend sitting on the tubes).

The same coding rules apply to all sorts of boats used for all sorts of things. e.g. this little ferry http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4VT_V5rAZx...Islands+09.JPG
Just as the coding doesn't apply to any sports done from the boat, e.g. water skiing, diving etc I'm not convinced it should really apply to extreme uses an operator decides to put a vessel to. Now if it is being used as a thrill ride then maybe it should have to comply to the same standards as roller coasters etc!
Sorry Poly but I did look at the photos and cannot agree with you regarding the hand rails. Diving and seasafari ribs are two different animals

PS: and yes before you ask I have been to spec savers
__________________
Andre
Andre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2017, 09:01   #10
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre View Post
Sorry Poly but I did look at the photos and cannot agree with you regarding the hand rails.
you don't agree those boats are:
- UK built?
- Have handrails in front of the front seat passenger?

By the way the irony that the picture you used to illustrate the best rib for sea safari seating - seems to have two people (crew?) perched on the tubes was not lost on me, but I thought I'd let it pass.

Quote:
Diving and seasafari ribs are two different animals
thats kind of my point - although actually I don't think its seasafaris that are the problem - its the "thrill" ride part of it rather than the safari part. But the regs don't make any distinction between the use of the boat as a commuter ferry, a way of getting to a work site, a boat for recreational diving or fishing, charter for racing, dolphin or scenery watching, or aiming to scare the bejesus out of a stag party. Vessels are assessed for their suitability for the water they will be used in, not for the purpose to which they might happen to be put. It is surely for the operator (and skipper) to have assess that.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rib

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.