Originally Posted by codprawn
Some obviously were then...........
I don't think that is the point. What you have alleged is that the directors of Picton Boats Ltd deliberately placed the company in receivership (or similar) in order to obtain a financial advantage for themselves. Also that they did this with no concern for their employees and in particular arranged matters in such a way as to deprive them of their redundancy pay.
Now you might say you were only repeating what you heard and it may not be true. If you don't believe it is true, why say it? If you do believe it is true, where is the evidence.
By the way, have the police questioned you about a case of indecent exposure in Swansea?