Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 16 September 2012, 17:31   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,251
DSC - Is it all its cracked up to be?

So 3 weeks ago I discovered a website with a live feed of Solent VHF CH16, 67 etc. It also tracks DSC messages and DSC Distress Alerts.

I expected this to be full of DSC messages and alerts. Listening in there is certainly PLENTY of traffic on 16 and 67. Quite an eye opener as I've not been on the water in the solent since having a VHF radio and the amount of traffic is vast compared to my home waters. But good lord are there some numpties on the water down there.

Its been an amusing few hours ona weekend spent sat working at the 'puter listening to WAFIs and Gin Palaces discovering the concept of the tide means the water depth may change over time and they might bump their bottoms.

Virtually none of these groudnings, or the numerous 'lost engines' have been declared PAN PANs though I always understood they should be. in 3 weekends there has been 1 DSC distress alert which was sent as a distress but voiced as a PAN PAN for a grounding. Solent CG didn't acknowledge the DSC within 4 minutes as they were voice working the caller as a pan pan but the alert was a mayday so it was re-transmitted by the calling radio and at the same time retransmitted by 2 other stations as it hadn't been acknowledged.

So... ...if there is an alert it doesn't seem to get responded to as efficiently as the books would claim. They asked for all the boat details, position, call sign, MMSI etc then seemed to realise it was the DSC boat. So they already had all that.

However, thats not the bit that surprises me. In a panic people will never want to hit the red button till the water is round their ears.

What surprises me is that the number of digital calls is tiny. Less than 50 in today... and that includes replies to calls so <25. That seems miniscule. People seem happier to go to a listening channel, repeat their name 3 times far too quickly to be heard and then get impatient when they get no response...

Am I missing something or is DSC not all its claimed to be? I'd far rather programme in my Marinas and contacts and be able to page them direct and not worry about them hearing their name in amongst all the traffic...

Don't even get me started on the number of people who should be calling Port Solent on CH80 who call on 16! Or the constant radio checks to CG on 16 when even though I don't sail the Solent I know Solent CG prefer boat to boat radio checks and if thats not possible to do them on 67 with CG.
__________________

__________________
ShinyShoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2012, 17:36   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Northampton
Make: RibTec
Length: 5m +
Engine: Outbaord mariner 75
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 506
hmm what the web site.?
When I did my VHF course they made us call the CG on 16 then the CG directs you to 67 for the radio check. I have even been made to spell out the boats name for the radio check.

Is that not the correct porcedure? Call CG on 16 then move the th eworking channel when instructed?
__________________

__________________
jezza2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2012, 17:47   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,251
ship-tracking.co.uk

In normal areas where you can get a word in edgeways on the radio that is considered normal practice call on 16, transfer to 67 (or for portalnd coz solent is so busy on 16 and 67 they'll move you to 73). Although if its just for a radio check it actually takes more air time to move you than for you to call and include radio check in your initial call. That should also let the CG guys understand the priority of your call. In Solent they often come back and say "If your call is routine traffic please go channel 67 otherwise go ahead" that seems to be because the callers don't identify to CG on 16 that their call has any urgency to it like a PAN PAN prefix! I guess they can hear the fear in their voices!!

In Solent Area 16 is so busy with people who parked their big shiny white thing on a rock and want the AA to come and top up their empty fuel they have a constant listening watch on 67 to deal with routine traffic so they prefer you to call all non-urgent work direct on 67 to avoid clocking 16 up.

But if you are using DSC you can call them with DSC and nominate the working channel as 67 in that process so you never speak on 16 so leave it free for a distress call.
__________________
ShinyShoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2012, 19:34   #4
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
The user interface and user experience on most dsc radios is so poor I'm not surprised average punters aren't using them properly. Especially since the rya course is largely focussed around distress rather than routine calling, and in the vast majority of cases will be on a single brand of radio - so at the very least excluding half the users.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 02:44   #5
Member
 
Channel Ribs's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: Alderney
Length: no boat
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,047
An excellent point Pol.
__________________
Channel Ribs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 05:22   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Ardfern
Boat name: Moon Raker
Make: Humber Destroyer
Length: 5m +
Engine: Honda BF 90 D
MMSI: 235035994
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poly View Post
The user interface and user experience on most dsc radios is so poor I'm not surprised average punters aren't using them properly. Especially since the rya course is largely focussed around distress rather than routine calling, and in the vast majority of cases will be on a single brand of radio - so at the very least excluding half the users.
Yes. To my mind, for routine traffic DSC just adds another layer of complication and delay to what should be quick and simple communication. Direct calling to CG on a working channel, bypassing 16, seems a good idea.

The real benefit of DSC is the automatic distress and urgency alerting which, provided the VHF is connected to a GPS, gives a position (and slightly better range than voice calls). It takes just a few seconds, there is no need to talk if there's no time.

If a distress alert is received and no further contact is made then I think the GC will mobilise resources to the position as they know that there is some sort of casualty.
__________________
alystra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 08:07   #7
SPR
Trade member
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Central Belt of Scotland
Boat name: Puddleduck III
Make: Bombard
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,066
on my VHF training course, I spend time on routine traffic - after all hopefully this is the most thing you will use your radio for.

Different brands are slightly different to use, but this is like mobiles too!

I always offer to go to the persons boat if they are local to me and go through the radio with them, after the course.

the CG only listen to 16 on a speaker - no dedicated watch - and Forth Coastguard only had 4 on duty at any time. So making a "dedicated"watch on 67 not practical. If you used The DSC call there radio will bleep and no messing about on 16 or relying on somebody releasing you on 67.

Solent I believe is one of the few places that uses 67 as routine due to the sheer volume.

Programme the MMSi of the CG into radio and routine calling is easier...
__________________
SPRmarine / SPRtraining
RYA Training Courses & Safety Equipment Sales
SPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 08:32   #8
Member
 
Channel Ribs's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: Alderney
Length: no boat
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,047
All three Channel Islands CGs listen out on their working channel 24/7 as well as 16. Not saying what is right or wrong, just for info.

Spending time on routine calls and DSC seems like an excellent component of the course.
__________________
Channel Ribs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 08:39   #9
SPR
Trade member
 
SPR's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Central Belt of Scotland
Boat name: Puddleduck III
Make: Bombard
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,066
I only ever take 6 people as maximum on a course instead of 12! and routinely run courses with only 2! so suppose I have but more time for people to learn the radios..

regards

S.
__________________
SPRmarine / SPRtraining
RYA Training Courses & Safety Equipment Sales
SPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2012, 08:52   #10
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by alystra View Post
Yes. To my mind, for routine traffic DSC just adds another layer of complication and delay to what should be quick and simple communication. Direct calling to CG on a working channel, bypassing 16, seems a good idea.
actually I'd disagree. I think its a perfectly sensible approach - its just its poorly taught and clumsily executed. The instructor on my course encouraged us to use DSC for routine stuff so we got more used to the functions of our own radios - but actually spent very little time (and no practice) doing it.

Quote:
The real benefit of DSC is the automatic distress and urgency alerting which, provided the VHF is connected to a GPS, gives a position (and slightly better range than voice calls). It takes just a few seconds, there is no need to talk if there's no time.
I think it is mis sold as this being the only real benefit. A fairly useful benefit is keeping 16 free. The ability to position poll a friends boat e.g. is also another useful feature but not taught on the course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPR View Post
on my VHF training course, I spend time on routine traffic - after all hopefully this is the most thing you will use your radio for.
In my experience (which is obviously limited as doing the course once was bad enough) this is probably not the norm. Whilst we did touch on routine calling, 80+% of the time was spent on distress calling. Something which as Alystra says is supposed to be pretty simple.
Quote:
Different brands are slightly different to use, but this is like mobiles too!
I have owned at least 4 different brands of phone, all of which had differences in how you found or set things. All were easier to use than any DSC radio the first time you pick it up, especially for key functions like making a call or sending a text. I've not seen any radios which were even remotely as intuitive to use as a smartphone.

Quote:
Programme the MMSi of the CG into radio and routine calling is easier...
is there anyway to programme them all as a group, make a group call to all the CG's and let whichever is local answer? Whilst I'm sure I will get a response if I call "Clyde Coastguard" when I am actually in "Stornoway's" patch with a voice call, presumably that is a potential problem with DSC?
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.