Quote:
Originally Posted by roohairy
The harbour is on a tidal river, which extends well beyond the harbour limits and is still tidal. The harbour is used by a handfull of commercial vessels only and the management seems to be very anti leisure use - demanding copies of insurance to hold on file I believe is beyond reasonable.
Insurance is a question of scale - my 22' boat is insured, my 8' rowing boat is not! How many uninsured tenders are there in the UK, should insurance be compulsory for these also? How about canoes?
Or can the harbour authority ban a vessel from transiting the area because the vessel does not have an insurance certificate with them?
I feel that this is the 'thin end of the wedge' leading to ever more regulation!
Also in relaton to louise's link, I think that they are referring to inland waterways and even this is not correct - it depends on the navigation authority.
|
Why not have compulsory insurance, if you buy a new tv you have to fill out the form so the nice man in the tv detector van can check on you.
If you buy a car you cant tax it unless you have insurance. i think the training is very important. you would not let a person on the road with out training
and when you put in the variables like weather, tides, and knowing where the
rocks or sand banks are, it seams like a disaster waiting to happen to let some one out just because its there right to do so.
Dose any one know how many times the GG where called out last year
not because a yacht was demasted or some one hit a submerged object
but because some pratt tried to do a channel crossing and thought that if he just went straight ahead from the beach he would hit France eventually