Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 12 December 2010, 07:19   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Oldham
Boat name: Aqua Vitae
Make: Ribcraft 4.8
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yamaha 75hp
MMSI: 235115057
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 331
Coastguard cuts

Up to half of MRCCs to close and complete privatisation of the search and rescue helicopter fleet

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11978002

Does anyone know who to address concerns to?
Is there a public consultation on any of this?

Tim
__________________

__________________
A RIB is for life, not just for Christmas.
Northern Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2010, 07:31   #2
Member
 
m chappelow's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: yorkshire
Boat name: little vicky
Make: avon ex RNLI
Length: 3m +
Engine: tohatsu
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,310
Someone told me years ago that plans were been looked at with regards to a Eurocoastguard.

have sent you a P/m

Mart
__________________

__________________
m chappelow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2010, 16:12   #3
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Tim View Post
Up to half of MRCCs to close and complete privatisation of the search and rescue helicopter fleet

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11978002

Does anyone know who to address concerns to?
Is there a public consultation on any of this?

Tim
The S&R decision goes back to the previous government, and is not really news - the only "development" there being that the "new" government have decides to go ahead with the orginal decision (having been reviewing it for value for money). As I understand it the C.G. helo's already operate under similar arrangements, and I've never heard of anyone complaining, "Oh no they've sent the private guys, I wish they had sent the RAF/Navy instead". Given that the service evolved to rescue military personnel but are almost exclusively used to rescue civillians, it seems fairly logical that at some point someone would question its "ownership". I appreciate that we believe (very patriotically) that our military are the best in the world, and therefore must be the very best guys in the world to pluck you out of trouble. As I understand it many of the private sector crews are ex military, but using newer kit (which may or may not be more suited to its role).

As for the MRCC's being reduced in number... ...in many cases they are so remote from the area covered that any "local knowledge" must be limited (e.g. a call from the sound of Islay would be directed to a guy in Greenock; a call from Shetland goes to Aberdeen etc) so its certainly possible to see how their areas could be enlarged, although unless people are sitting twiddling their thumbs I don't see how you save money on (poorly paid) staff costs by merging sites.

If you are not happy with the proposals then I'd get in touch with your MP. If they are from a coalition party they might have some influence. If they are from the opposition then they may have less! You can of course contact the minister responsible for transport, and anyone else who might listen, but you'll need to have a structured argument as to why the proposals are wrong rather than just "don't upset the status quo".

EDIT: I have a far greater objection to the removal of emergency towing vessels (already decided). If they don't break even then charge vessels who need them sufficient to cover the annual costs. Yes the commercial sector needs to take responsibility but if there are major pollution incidents then it will take more than compensation to make it good.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2010, 16:17   #4
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by m chappelow View Post
Someone told me years ago that plans were been looked at with regards to a Eurocoastguard.
I'd have thought that is a long way off - the roles and responsibilities must be quite different in different areas? e.g. some places coordination, some places actual rescue (indeed we do some of that - but not lifeboats), some places security / border control etc?
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2010, 16:39   #5
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Make: Redbay Boats
Length: 9m +
Engine: 370hp
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,924
RIBase
We have had a similar change here in Ireland. Our armed forces previously ran the helo rescue services, CHC now perform that role under contract to the CG. I have a keen interest and have to say that the civvie crews are performing some stunning rescues in appalling conditions. If I was in the sh1t, I'd be very relieved to hear that they were looking for me. Also, I like 'em 'cos they gave me a spin

One thing though - the contracted services fly to civil aviation rules and this can have a major impact on rescue parameters. Fuel reserves are one big issue, suitable landing sites is another.

My CG mole occasionally gets wistful for the good ole days when the Green Machines would land in Hell and make it home with their total fuel reserve in the pilot's petrol lighter
__________________
"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?"
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2010, 18:32   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Oldham
Boat name: Aqua Vitae
Make: Ribcraft 4.8
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yamaha 75hp
MMSI: 235115057
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 331
One of my concerns is in the "search" element of search and rescue.

If the helo is being run by a private company then it's being run for profit. This could mean that they will be less willing to continue a search if they are watching profits, whereas military guys will keep going as long as there is a chance of being found alive.

Is this worry unfounded? I don't think any of us would want profit being put before life.
__________________
A RIB is for life, not just for Christmas.
Northern Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2010, 03:39   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Boat name: Mistress
Make: Tornado or Ribcraft
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2x 115hp
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Tim View Post
One of my concerns is in the "search" element of search and rescue.

If the helo is being run by a private company then it's being run for profit. This could mean that they will be less willing to continue a search if they are watching profits, whereas military guys will keep going as long as there is a chance of being found alive.

Is this worry unfounded? I don't think any of us would want profit being put before life.
Northen Tim,
I agree. Search and Rescue is inherently un-cost effective.
T
__________________
tompaddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2010, 03:44   #8
RIBnet supporter
 
Pikey Dave's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Yorks
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: Ribcraft
Length: 5m +
Engine: DF140a
MMSI: 235111389
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,581
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Tim View Post
One of my concerns is in the "search" element of search and rescue.

If the helo is being run by a private company then it's being run for profit. This could mean that they will be less willing to continue a search if they are watching profits, whereas military guys will keep going as long as there is a chance of being found alive.

Is this worry unfounded? I don't think any of us would want profit being put before life.
That all depends on how the contract is structured, they may be paid "by the hour" for certain duties, in which case it would be in their best interest to stay in the air. Knowing how clever HM gov't are in negotiating their contracts........
__________________
Rule#2: Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level & then beat you with experience.
Rule#3: Tha' can't educate pork.
Rule#4: See rule#5
Pikey Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2010, 07:12   #9
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Make: Redbay Boats
Length: 9m +
Engine: 370hp
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,924
RIBase
If they work it like here, it's the CG who call the shots as regards search duration. Which means that it's the Conservatives who are deciding how much your wee life is worth in flight time.

No worries then
__________________
"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?"
.
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2010, 07:16   #10
Member
 
ashbypower's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salisbury/Poole
Boat name: Blue C
Make: XS 600
Length: 6m +
Engine: 125hp Opti
MMSI: 235082826/235909566
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,439
Current Coastguard Helo's are run under contract and we havent heard of any horror stories, so surley expanding this to cover area's where military currently cover should not be a problem..
__________________

__________________
Brian C
Harbour Sea School & APS Marine Centre
ashbypower is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.