Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 07 May 2017, 18:13   #1
Member
 
Country: Spain
Town: spain costa blanca
Boat name: hd 380
Make: quicksilver
Length: 3m +
Engine: 25 suzuki
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 41
bombard comando vs zodiac futura

Hello,

I would like to ask if the 3 part " rigid keel " of the bombard is better in rough sea conditions as the inflatable keel with speed tubes of the zodiac.

Some people or zodiac salers told me that the speed tubes absorb the waves in roughes conditions.

and that it is same as the 3-part keel of the bombard.

Somebody can advice or have tested both ?

Sorry for my mistakes.
__________________
spainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 May 2017, 18:17   #2
Member
 
Country: Spain
Town: spain costa blanca
Boat name: hd 380
Make: quicksilver
Length: 3m +
Engine: 25 suzuki
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 41
i hade before a zodiac mark III GR, quicksilver HD 380 and all these boats in rough conditions are pretty not nice to drive. the knocks by the waves to the bottom is transmitting very hard to the floor bords.
So maybe speed tubes or Bombard 3 piece keel are better in this conditions.
or maybe a complete inflatable floor with keel like bombard aerotec ???
Please advice.
__________________
spainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 May 2017, 13:39   #3
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Look at this way:
The Bombard Commando has one less chamber to inflate.

They're both very good boats.

My experience with the Futura is that the "shock mitigating" quality of the speed tubes is minor. However, they do affect the planing qualities of the boat...specifically, it planes quickly at low speeds, and the top speed is very high with light loads.

I like both.

The Commando is a little more simple in construction.

What size outboard are you looking to run? What size boat?
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 May 2017, 19:22   #4
Member
 
Country: Spain
Town: spain costa blanca
Boat name: hd 380
Make: quicksilver
Length: 3m +
Engine: 25 suzuki
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 41
I am looking for comando c5 or futura mark III both with maximum engine 50-60 hp
__________________
spainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 May 2017, 20:02   #5
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by spainman View Post
I am looking for comando c5 or futura mark III both with maximum engine 50-60 hp
Futura will have a higher top speed in calm conditions. Load carrying capacity will be higher. Handling will be better. If you tow a skier, wakeboard, or tube at all, then I would go with the Futura.

Commando will be easier to maintain and should be a cheaper boat as well. No speed tubes to worry about, and no keel to inflate.

Both boats are made in the same factory on the same assembly line.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 May 2017, 20:18   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Retford
Boat name: Spy-sea-one
Make: Excel 435
Length: 4m +
Engine: Suzuki Outboard/25/4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,441
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by spainman View Post
Hello,

I would like to ask if the 3 part " rigid keel " of the bombard is better in rough sea conditions as the inflatable keel with speed tubes of the zodiac.

Some people or zodiac salers told me that the speed tubes absorb the waves in roughes conditions.

and that it is same as the 3-part keel of the bombard.

Somebody can advice or have tested both ?

Sorry for my mistakes.
I like the bombard would have had one when I bought mine but we're not available because of the buy out at the time, expeditions use them and I like the wood keel only the tubes to worry about then.
__________________
jeffstevens763@g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 May 2017, 03:12   #7
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: GTA
Boat name: Seabright
Make: Seabright
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP ETec Tiller
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 234
I have a Futura Mk3. I haven't owned a Bombard.
The Bombard has a deeper V shape to the hull, which should make for a slightly smoother ride in rough seas, as it cuts through more.
I agree with Richard; the speed tubes have no real cushioning effect in rough seas. Someone is telling you that to make a sale.
My Futura has removable speed tubes, but I believe the newer ones don't. If you have to repair one it is a big problem.
Inflating the tubes and the keel is a pain. I think if I were you I would give serious consideration to the Bombard.
3 fewer potential failure points.
I recall hearing that the keel is a bit of a pain to assemble though.
I thought the Futura would be fast, but with a ETEC 50 and 17p stainless prop the best I can do is about 32 MPH.
My next boat will not have speed tubes.
__________________
Northern Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 May 2017, 21:10   #8
Member
 
Country: Spain
Town: spain costa blanca
Boat name: hd 380
Make: quicksilver
Length: 3m +
Engine: 25 suzuki
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 41
thank´s a lot guys for the answers.

I am surprised with northern Pike, it seams not so fas as i have been thinking.

Have you got Trim/tilt botton ad the etec 50 ?
__________________
spainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 May 2017, 21:32   #9
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: GTA
Boat name: Seabright
Make: Seabright
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP ETec Tiller
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 234
Yes. Power trim/tilt. The only other thing I can think of is a custom made prop with a high pitch and small diameter. I think the hull is the limiting factor.
__________________
Northern Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2017, 00:48   #10
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: S. Carolina
Boat name: D560
Make: Avon
Length: 5m +
Engine: 2016 Merc 115hp CT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Pike View Post
I have a Futura Mk3. I haven't owned a Bombard.
The Bombard has a deeper V shape to the hull, which should make for a slightly smoother ride in rough seas, as it cuts through more.
I agree with Richard; the speed tubes have no real cushioning effect in rough seas. Someone is telling you that to make a sale.
My Futura has removable speed tubes, but I believe the newer ones don't. If you have to repair one it is a big problem.
Inflating the tubes and the keel is a pain. I think if I were you I would give serious consideration to the Bombard.
3 fewer potential failure points.
I recall hearing that the keel is a bit of a pain to assemble though.
I thought the Futura would be fast, but with a ETEC 50 and 17p stainless prop the best I can do is about 32 MPH.
My next boat will not have speed tubes.
More prop, more trim, and get the outboard farther out of the water.

Basically, you want the rear 1/3 of the boat to be the only thing touching the water.
__________________
Richard
Gluing geek since 2007
Opinions and intepretations expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer
office888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2017, 01:20   #11
Member
 
Country: Canada
Town: GTA
Boat name: Seabright
Make: Seabright
Length: 5m +
Engine: 50 HP ETec Tiller
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 234
I've done a lot of experimenting. I've had the motor up to where it was over-ventilating. Tried numerous props. Only thing left to try is a smaller diameter high pitch prop which is not commercially available.
__________________
Northern Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2017, 09:35   #12
Member
 
Brage's Avatar
 
Country: Norway
Town: Oslo
Boat name: Seatrout express
Make: Zodiac Milpro
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yamaha 40
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by spainman View Post
I am looking for comando c5 or futura mark III both with maximum engine 50-60 hp
Theres a Futura Mark III for sale here in Oslo. No patches or leaks. Asking price is 900 Euros/bids. Shipping to Spain is aprox 100 Euros (SEA fright).

I can arrange packing and shipping for Free if I can keep the jockey console.

https://www.finn.no/boat/forsale/ad....n&fks=96102278

Cheers
__________________
Brage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
zodiac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.