Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26 November 2013, 12:00   #11
Anchorhandler's Avatar
Country: France
Town: Huisnes sur Mer
Boat name: Raufoss
Make: Avon
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury 50
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 789
Originally Posted by martini View Post

High tensile bolts are the right ones for the job, stamped with 4.8 on the head rather than 8.8.
Hi Matt, What's your objection to 8.8?

4.8 is generally refereed to as carpentry grade over here used in assembling wooden structures.
In engineering terms we only really start considering a bolt to be high tensile at 8.8 or above.

Of course the Op could opt for A2-80 which is high tensile stainless if he's worried about it.


Sent from my Experia Ultra europallet using

C'est pas l'homme qui prend la mer, c'est la mer qui prend l'homme....
Anchorhandler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 17:29   #12
martini's Avatar
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,018
Sorry, got that the wrong way round. 8.8 is the higher strength - 4.8 & 8.8 are the 2 that we normally see floating around the UK. Both are ok, one more ok than the other though

Actually this has prompted me to look up tensile strength on a few bolts and it's quite surprising. A2/70 = 700Nmm2, 8.8 HT = 800Nmm2, not much in it

martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 02:18   #13
Razorbill's Avatar
Country: UK - England
Town: The West End, Penryn.
Boat name: Jenny Haniver
Make: Pacific 8313
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mermaid Turbo 4
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 134
Thanks for all your input, I'll be keeping with the standard high tensile bolts.
Razorbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 03:00   #14
Country: UK - England
Town: macclessfield
Boat name: Reach Out
Make: Quicksilver
Length: 4m +
Engine: 30hp Tohatsu EFI
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 301
Standard Stainless is tough.... The main issue can be binding of the nut to the bolt when over tightened or the thread damaged. The screw may have to be ground off if it 'picks up' on the thread..

If the bolt is under so much stress as that the difference between 8.8 and stainless is a concern, then maybe the design is too marginal, or you are building a race boat/landrover winch.
simsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 05:41   #15
Country: UK - England
Town: Surrey
Boat name: Fugly & Rokraider 1
Make: Pac 22 & Porter 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Ford 250 & jet,DT140
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 681
Don't know how old your vehicle is, but i believe that from 98 onwards all towbars and related parts have to be as homologated for the E mark, which presumably means that the bolts need to be to same or higher specification as tested?
Rokraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2013, 07:25   #16
Phil M's Avatar
Country: UK - England
Town: Whitehaven
Boat name: Pegasus
Make: Zodiac Pro 530
Length: 5m +
Engine: 115hp Merc 4st
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 276
For information, the bolt designation for non stainless is as follows. The first number is the tensile strength designator. multiply by 100 to get the tensile strength in MPa. The second number is the yield stress multiplier. Multiply the tensile stress by second number to get the yield, e.g. a 4.6 bolt has a yield of 400MPa and a tensile strength of 240MPa (0.6*400). High tensile bolts are regarded as 8.8 and above (other designations are 10.9 and 12.9).

Stainless ones are a little different in categorisation. Austenitic bolts (A series) come in grades A1 to A5, with the more common grades being A2 and A4. Tensile strength is provided but due to differences in behaviours, yield strength is replaced by the stress at 0.2% permanent strain. Strengths are as follows:-

Grade______Property class____Tensile Strength_____0.2% proof strength
A1 and A2_______50___________500MPa_____________210MPa
A3 and A4_______70___________700MPa_____________450MPa
A5_____________80___________800MPa_____________600 MPa

The equivalent of a grade 8.8 is thus an A5 bolt, not an A2, which are weak as cheese. For a permanent bolted joint tightened to a high (and hopefully specified/measured torque), such as a tow bar, it is important to match the yield and tensile strengths as this will affect the strength of the joint.

Another notable point is the galvanic potential of the materials. Although the stainless bolts are less prone to corrosion, if in direct contact with unpainted mild steel, they will cause accelerated corrosion of the mild steel. I have seen many stainless pipes connected with mild steel bolts which have turned to dust in a matter of only a few years. It is common in industry to use a more corrosion prone bolt as its easier/cheaper to replace a bolt rather than the item being bolted.

It is also worth noting that A4 is more corrosion resistant than A2, hence used more often on boats, even where the strength is not required.

Hopefully these ramblings will be of use to somebody!

Phil M is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2015 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.