Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 01 June 2010, 03:31   #11
RIBnet supporter
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Coast
Length: 7m +
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,445
Yes it was from Poole & no they will not be using that tank again. They did me a "favour" using it, as they were out of fuel in the main tank!

I will be changing the filters on Wednesday and again on Saturday, by which time we should have filled the tanks a couple of times and therefore flushed through.

I am having additional filters fitted in the bilge to trap any contamination before it gets to the engine filters and am also going to carry additional engine filters.
__________________
250kts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 03:57   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorset & Hants
Boat name: Streaker/Orange
Make: Avon/Ribcraft
Length: 4m +
Engine: 50Yam/25 Mariner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,551
I'm relieved for you, but I am sure not as relieved as you! A simple fix and great that Simon got the bits needed, it gives me more confidence to let him look after mine.
I'd be having words with the supplier to pay for the parts, time and loss of earnings. Nicely at first then talking to thier liability insurers if they dont sort you out !
__________________

__________________
PeterM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 11:02   #13
RIBnet supporter
 
Country: UK - England
Town: South Coast
Length: 7m +
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,445
Question?

Should I report this to the MAIB? As a commercial operator, had we lost the other engine, we would have had 14 people on the rocks and a destroyed vessel.

Steve
__________________
250kts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 11:08   #14
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Boat name: Gemineye
Make: Ribeye S850 charter
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp
MMSI: 235097445
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by 250kts View Post
Question?

Should I report this to the MAIB? As a commercial operator, had we lost the other engine, we would have had 14 people on the rocks and a destroyed vessel.

Steve
Steve , not unless someone knows to the contrary, this was not a near miss, would be similar to my engine failing, throwing anchor down and sorting problem before returning to base. Thie site states "To fulfil its primary role of improving safety of life at sea, it is essential that the MAIB investigates accidents immediately, before vital evidence decays, is removed or is lost.Having reported the accident by telephone, a completed incident report form should be emailed or faxed to +44 23 8023 2459 as soon as possible.

Serious injuries, those resulting in incapacitation for longer than three days that are not major injuries, must be investigated by the vessel’s master and owners. The findings of this investigation must then be reported to the MAIB within 14 days, using the incident report form.

The law does not require hazardous incidents to be reported. However, the MAIB encourages owners, masters and skippers to report them using the incident report form or the dedicated reporting line. Hazardous incidents often teach us lessons that are every bit as relevant as those arising from accidents."
http://www.maib.gov.uk/cms_resources...GN%20289_1.pdf

I would record it in incident book for your own records and how the matter was dealt with along with final resolution.
Hope that helps
__________________
Ian
Rib charter and Rib hire with www.c2ribs.co.uk
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 11:35   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorset & Hants
Boat name: Streaker/Orange
Make: Avon/Ribcraft
Length: 4m +
Engine: 50Yam/25 Mariner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,551
I'd say a resounding yes ! If it were aircraft fuel problem the CAA would be all over it. I'd expect the same principles apply to your situation.

From the MAIB notes ;

22. Although there is no requirement to report hazardous incidents, the MAIB strongly urges anyperson to do so voluntarily, since useful lessons can always be learned. Examples are “nearmisses”,including failure of procedures in shipboard operations, material defects, fatigue, and human failures. The critical question in deciding whether or not to report an incident is whether
it had the potential to lead to an accident
. These reports should also be sent using an IRF, or if preferred, in narrative form. Many incidents occur which do not cause injury or damage, but have the potential to be hazardous or to have serious consequences.23. When making reports, whether on an IRF or in narrative, the content of the descriptive text is particularly important. Lessons can be learned from the positive as well as negative aspects.Details of actions taken to minimise the effects of the accident or, in the case of a hazardous incident, to prevent it developing into an accident, are particularly helpful. A description of
actions taken or recommendations made to prevent a recurrence are also of value.
Much is gained from the information provided by those most closely involved in the event at the time it occurred.

As you say you could have been in big trouble (as could have any number of single engined boats with people on board- ie the like of me....) due to some kind of procedure failiure at the pumps. I'd expect the supplier (whoever they maybe) to be considering reporting it themselves and inviting feedback to understand how/ why it happened and what needs to be done to stop it happening again.

The views and considerations of your skipper I feel would be invaluable to the MAIB tounderstand how he considered the risk of the second engine failing considering position, how what or if he told the passangers etc.
__________________
PeterM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 12:02   #16
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Boat name: Gemineye
Make: Ribeye S850 charter
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp
MMSI: 235097445
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,029
"no requirement to report hazardous incidents, the MAIB strongly urges anyperson"

I read and accept this and can see the other view, I would expect several views and can see the advantage to a phone call to seek advice but on what is given I still dont see you need to report. Open to being knocked down though
__________________
Ian
Rib charter and Rib hire with www.c2ribs.co.uk
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 12:13   #17
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Dorset & Hants
Boat name: Streaker/Orange
Make: Avon/Ribcraft
Length: 4m +
Engine: 50Yam/25 Mariner
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,551
I can see both sides , but my feeling is not based on any kind of blame scanrio, just one of being 100% transparant to all parties and avoiding recurrance/ risk.

There is also the consideration of knowing if there are/were any others with potential problems sloshing around the tanks - The MAIB may see a pattern or not in what would seem to be a silent & invisible problem until it presents itself.

Consider if another RIB is bouncing around with this in the tank - the worst happens and it hs not been reported ?

The only question that will be asked is ...Why wasn't it reported ?
__________________
PeterM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 15:09   #18
Member
 
chewy's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Up Norf
Make: Avon SR4,Tremlett 23
Length: 4m +
Engine: Yam 55, Volvo 200
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,217
No harm in giving them a ring.
I'd personally report it.
__________________
chewy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 15:29   #19
Member
 
Paul Cannell's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Kings Lynn
Boat name: Blow 'N' Away
Length: 7m +
MMSI: 235085136
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 474
250K, if you can tell me I would also like to know where the fuel came from please, (via pm).

I wouldn't want to fuel there on the way to or from Weymouth, even worse if someone was making a channel crossing.
__________________
Paul Cannell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01 June 2010, 16:43   #20
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Make: Redbay Boats
Length: 9m +
Engine: 370hp
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,928
RIBase
250kts - I think I'd settle for my filter/mech costs and, um, a gratis tank of fuel. And you have a big tank, which would be well empty...

And I'd keep Stum, 'cos they've learnt their lesson and there's no ongoing risk to the public
__________________

__________________
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.