Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 18 January 2005, 13:04   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: Guernsey
Boat name: No Nonsense
Make: Pro Sport
Length: 7m +
Engine: Suzuki 250
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
Suzuki vs. Evinrude

I have to make a decision on what engine to put on my new ProSport 7.5m, I'm looking at either a suzuki 250 4stroke or the new evinrude 250 E-tec. Has anyone got any views on this, thanks
__________________
tomfalla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 13:18   #2
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Helston, Cornwall
Boat name: Silver Fern
Make: Rayglass Protector
Length: 8m +
Engine: 2 x 250hp Verado
MMSI: 235024092
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 811
Send a message via AIM to gingercoastie Send a message via MSN to gingercoastie
Verado
__________________


Its all got to go - make me an offer...............

Skype - alexgreig
gingercoastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 13:57   #3
Member
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: St Peter Port
Boat name: Black Pig
Make: XS-Ribs
Length: 9m +
Engine: 2 x 225hp Optimax
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 375
Love my Optimax........but Verado!
__________________
Which part of "throw me the mooring line" didn't you understand!?
pettal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 14:00   #4
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Plymouth
Boat name: 2XS
Make: Halmatic Pacific 24
Length: 7m +
Engine: 135hp Honda X2
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 529
Johnson/Evenrude

Lighter and more fuel efficient

IMHO or course
__________________
Ian A

www.austinmarine.co.uk
Ian Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 17:14   #5
Member
 
ribraff's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Dartmouth
Length: 6m +
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,220
The fuel consumption figures certainly favour the E-tec's
__________________
Hypalon Tubes built in-house,retubing, repairs, Accessories
www.ribtube.co.uk
ribraff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 20:21   #6
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Looe
Make: Delta
Length: 4m +
Engine: Mercury
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,409
Verado!!!! :d
__________________
Turbodiesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 20:22   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Essex/Vendee
Boat name: shockwave,Voluntry 2
Make: Pac 22/ searider5.4
Length: 6m +
Engine: 180hp turbo,yam 90
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,022
I can only give you the benifit of my experience. I have had only 2 strokes mainly because of my racing days of Enduro/motorcross and the power they give out .I have had two new ficht engines on different boats in the last two years.the first did have some teathing problems but evenrude delt with these using their top engineer (Rod Bowers)He drove to my dealers to sort out the problem parts were replace regardless of cost.. Evenrude waranty are very good.I am very pleased with the 150 ficht .I would definately go for the E -Tech.You must however consider the rigging out as you will i think have a flow and return oil pipe as well as independant oiltank.Its a difficult choice as the suzuki is also a very nice piece of engineering.The crunch cums when you hear the roar of the 6 cylinders(of two stroke) Sir Phil Davies will comfirm fantastic
__________________
PeterR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 20:57   #8
Member
 
Country: Ireland
Town: Dublin
Boat name: wizzard
Make: REDBAY
Length: 7m +
Engine: 225 optimax
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 835
etec

If our fichts are anything to go by, then Etec can only be better, we currently between 2 fichts have 1016 hrs on them combined, great motors, we are getting a combined 1.25nm per l out of 2 x 75hp. Amazing low end grunt, do you really want the extra weight and service intervals of a fourstroke, you wont beat the Etec fuel figures, Verrados look amazing, until you look at the weights, and the complexity of them under the hoods,

spoil yourself go Etec
__________________
www.dublinsislands.com

WHEN THE CAT IS AWAY THE MICE GO TO REDBAY..............
gavin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 22:03   #9
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Boat name: SOLD
Length: under 3m
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 794
Just back from Mauritius the Hotel had a 250 suzuki on there ski come fish boat with nearly 1000 hours trouble free and it realy did take some stick the drivers had no respect at all for boat or engine.
i have never had an evenrude so i cant comment. i have had a 225 Yamaha four stroke and that was great with fantasic fuel figures.bit of a delema i know as i have a new rib on order and am in the same position as what to order. I keep looking at the Honda 225 its the five year warrenty. love to to know what you finaly deside on
Roy
__________________
Roy Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 22:38   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: St Davids
Boat name: 6 vessels -various
Make: Quinquari/Humber
Length: 10m +
Engine: Twin ETEC200s
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by no fear
.I would definately go for the E -Tech.You must however consider the rigging out as you will i think have a flow and return oil pipe as well as independant oiltank.

No oil return (as was on the Ficht/DI) on the ETEC but large oil tank fitted independant.

We are consigning 20 plus of the 200hps ETECS and the ones fitted so far are superb. As mentioned the one thing with Evinrude is that Rod & co give a good back up.

In fairness Suzi also a good well engineered engine. We are trialing a pair of their 250ies and hope to report back soon.

Yam also worth a mention, ask Tony at Seafari Oban who swears by them.

Cheers

John
www.quinquari.co.uk
__________________
quinquarimarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2005, 22:49   #11
Member
 
Country: Other
Length: 6m +
Engine: 200
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinquarimarine
We are consigning 20 plus of the 200hps ETECS and the ones fitted so far are superb.
John
www.quinquari.co.uk
John,

I know horses for courses what kinda fuel figures are ya getting per kmile.

have placed an order for one

Paul
__________________
Joint Ribtickler 2005
jackeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2005, 20:15   #12
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: St Davids
Boat name: 6 vessels -various
Make: Quinquari/Humber
Length: 10m +
Engine: Twin ETEC200s
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackeen
John,

I know horses for courses what kinda fuel figures are ya getting per kmile.

have placed an order for one

Paul

Paul the figures that we quote normally raise an eyebrow and clients querry whether we mean consumption per engine rather than the boat in total. However these figures are based on many years experience with DI and now the ETECs.

When we do get a customer who is still not convinced then we show them our fuel duty claims ...... the best way to assure as if we were using more fuel we would certainly claim the duty !!

Anyhow. ... the figures

on a 10m RHIB with twin 200s (one counter rot), vsl weight with equipment 2200kgs, 12 pax plus 2 crew takes it to approx 3500kgs.

Average sailing is 20% at 75% throttle, 40% mid range and balance low range & tickover. Max speed capable speed 54 knots, average speed over the hour 25 knots thus 25 nm in one hour.

Total consumption = 5 gallons per hour ie. 2.5 galls per engine bearing in mind that that is transporting a total laod of 3500kgs.

Now if we fit 150ies to the same boat cons. is same.

On longer offshore runs cuising at say 35knots consumption increases in total by about 1/2 gall.

We put the light consumption relative to load down to the efficiency of the hull and engines but critically we weigh all components before fitting and strive to achieve correct balance of the vsl. In particular we prefer a static hull to be slightly heavier on the bow (achieved by moving underdeck tanks forward) so that the bow does not rise to quickly/high and you need to increase power and trim to get the bow down ie. let gravity bring the bow down.

Thus I guess the moral is that having the most efficent engine around does not mean it will be efficient unless it is operated efficiently.

We have just fitted two vessels with 250ies and are expecting same figures but will report following tests.

Cheers

J
__________________
quinquarimarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2005, 20:55   #13
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Brittany/Portsmouth
Boat name: Merlin
Make: Solent 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: 200
MMSI: soon !
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,451
Many thanks for the detailed reply John.

So 2.5 gals = 13 ltrs apx for 25 nm = 2 nm a ltr apx for light cruising

Whow thats stunning

Interesting your insight into weight towards the bow when static . I wonder how many are set up that way ??? not many I would speculate 1!!!!

Thanks again

paul
__________________
Happy New Resolutions!!! : RIBbing for the craic!!!
The Jackeens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2005, 14:31   #14
Member
 
Country: Belgium
Make: Osprey
Length: 7m +
Engine: 250 HP E-Tec
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
[QUOTE=The Jackeens] Many thanks for the detailed reply John.

So 2.5 gals = 13 ltrs apx for 25 nm = 2 nm a ltr apx for light cruising

Whow thats stunning


this is really low! how much rev's are you turning at 25 nm and 35 nm???
I hope I’ll obtain more or less the same results once I’ll have my etec. In order to obtain a better balance mine will have a ballast tank in the bow.
__________________
Seaharrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2005, 15:03   #15
Member
 
Cookee's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jackeens

So 2.5 gals = 13 ltrs apx for 25 nm = 2 nm a ltr apx for light cruising

Whow thats stunning

Thanks again

paul
It might be even more stunning actually - I thought it was 4.5 litres to the gallon which means - 2.5 X 4.5 = 11.25 litres for 25nm = 2.22 nm per litre! Apologies if I have the conversion wrong Paul!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
Cookee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2005, 15:21   #16
DJL
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Make: Ribcraft 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF175TG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 929
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jackeens
So 2.5 gals = 13 ltrs apx for 25 nm = 2 nm a ltr apx for light cruising
Cookee you are correct;

2.5 gallon [UK] = 11.37 litrs -> 2.2nm/l

Blimey!
__________________
DJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2005, 16:18   #17
Member
 
Country: Other
Length: 6m +
Engine: 200
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 344
Yep Lads you are correct,

i was just rounding up, for simplicity. General rule of tumb.

Too much hassle to get a calculator out

Paul
__________________
Joint Ribtickler 2005
jackeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2005, 21:57   #18
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: St Davids
Boat name: 6 vessels -various
Make: Quinquari/Humber
Length: 10m +
Engine: Twin ETEC200s
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 130
[QUOTE=Seaharrier]
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jackeens
Many thanks for the detailed reply John.

So 2.5 gals = 13 ltrs apx for 25 nm = 2 nm a ltr apx for light cruising

Whow thats stunning


this is really low! how much rev's are you turning at 25 nm and 35 nm???
I hope I’ll obtain more or less the same results once I’ll have my etec. In order to obtain a better balance mine will have a ballast tank in the bow.
Paul,

For 35 knots about 4500rpm and 25 then 3800rpm. That is based on a full load of 12 pax plus 2 crew plus 400kg fuel on a 10m.

A couple of points to be fair.

1. I comented in my last e-mail about balancing the boat. We find this critical but it is far easier to balance a 10m with bodies on board than say a 6m. Thus we take our hat of to those that achieve balance on say a 5m.

2.We operate mainly at medium revs, rely on twins that are set at critical cls for our set up, prop well and use counter rots.

Thus again I say the ETECs and DIs, Suzis and the Yams have superb consumption but the set up and operation of the boat is equal in the effiency equation.

Cheers

John
www.quinquari.co.uk
__________________
quinquarimarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 23:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.