Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 03 June 2013, 04:57   #1
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: Thunder
Make: Halmatic Arctic 22
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2 x 150 Etec
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 500
Opinion on a dealer problem.

Got an issue that I would appareciate peoples opinion on.

I had a problem with the SS fuel tank where the welds had cracked and had let water into the fuel. Local dealer who had also fitted the engines offered to arrange to have a new tank made, there was no formal quote but a loose figure of 700 was mentioned, he was having it made by a thrid party so I would trust him on the price being reasonable. The old tank was supplied to the fabricators for them to copy, they utilised the old filling spigot but the rest of the tank would be brand new. The new tank arrived, looked excellent and much tidier than the old one ever did, it was installed but some time later I had another incident of water in the fuel. Assumed it must be connections which weren't right, ran through all of them but everything seemed fine. I took the boat to another Glasgow Evinrude dealer for him to try to resolve the issue, he found that the welds on the fuel pick up spigots were leaking and had to be rewelded, I also had to replce the injectors in the engine that had been running off the new tank, a bill of 3,750.

I have been billed for the new fuel tank at a cost of 1,200, seems very expensive especially given that they had the old tank which must have been worth a few quid for scrap. Had everything been good with it I would just shrug, pay it and move on, however I have ended up having to shell out a small fortune as a result of it being sub standard.

What on earth should I do?
__________________

__________________
GordyP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 05:25   #2
Member
 
Country: Other
Town: Stanley, Falkland Is
Boat name: Seawolf
Make: Osprey Vipermax 5.8
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 150
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,688
I think I'd be writing a Dear Sir letter with a report attached from the people who eventually sorted it out.
__________________

__________________
A Boat is a hole in the water, surrounded by fibreglass, into which you throw money...

Sent from my Computer, using a keyboard and mouse
BogMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 07:13   #3
RIBnet admin team
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Make: Redbay Boats
Length: 9m +
Engine: 370hp
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,924
RIBase
You don't say why you took the boat to a second dealer to resolve the issue - did the first dealer refuse to do so?

If you didn't give the first dealer a chance to make good the damage, they will be more than reluctance to pay the charges of the second dealer.
__________________
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 08:14   #4
Member
 
Cookee's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Salcombe, Devon, UK
Boat name: BananaShark
Make: BananaShark
Length: 10m +
Engine: 2xYanmar 260 diesels
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
You don't say why you took the boat to a second dealer to resolve the issue - did the first dealer refuse to do so?

If you didn't give the first dealer a chance to make good the damage, they will be more than reluctance to pay the charges of the second dealer.
+1!
__________________
Cookee
Originally Posted by Zippy
When a boat looks that good who needs tubes!!!
Cookee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 09:11   #5
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: Thunder
Make: Halmatic Arctic 22
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2 x 150 Etec
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 500
The first dealer has a history of things taking severel times the length of time than it should to deal with jobs. I'm not really expecting him to pay for the bigger bill, I really just wonder whether I should pay him anything for the tank?
__________________
GordyP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 12:06   #6
Member
 
csjukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 86
Pay the 700 for the tank itself, not thr extra 550 for the labour as clearly it was rubbish! Although considering the damage that was caused, maybe just show them 2 fingers
__________________
csjukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 14:05   #7
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: southampton
Make: ribeye
Length: 6m +
Engine: 100
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 194
As you have not got a quote, his price of 1200 less the cost of what you paid for the second repair.

If you feel the 1200 is excessive, ask for a cost break down materials/labour etc. and negotiate from there.
As always, get quote first and give the chap the chance to rectify.

Hindsight, wonderful thing to have
__________________
ribber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 14:17   #8
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,021
If the original fuel pipe spigots were utilised in the new tank, then the fault lies with the original tank fabricators, nothing to do with the new tank fabricators workmanship surely?

On the flip side, anyone taking on the responsibility of building a petrol tank should be pressure testing the tank before it goes out. Had they done that then the leak wouldve be highlighted and easily rectified.

Technically I dont think you've got much of a leg to stand on but I would go to the various parties concerned, put across the points above and see if they'll negotiate. If they all soak up a bit of the loss then all the better for you.

If you really don't want to pay, they know they could have a real struggle to force you to. They may realise they're better off just getting what they can back and moving on.
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 15:30   #9
Member
 
Bigmuz7's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: stramash
Make: Tornado
Length: 5m +
Engine: Etec 90
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by martini View Post
anyone taking on the responsibility of building a petrol tank should be pressure testing the tank before it goes out. Had they done that then the leak wouldve be highlighted and easily rectified
Thats where I see it .. fitting a bum tank wasnt the installers problem, the manufacturer should satisfy himself his work was good .. bespoke or otherwise
__________________
Bigmuz7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03 June 2013, 15:47   #10
Member
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Glasgow
Boat name: Thunder
Make: Halmatic Arctic 22
Length: 6m +
Engine: 2 x 150 Etec
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 500
The 1,200 was just for the fabrication of the tank, the spigots which leaked were newly fabricated ones.

Do you think I should offer to pay part of the cost of the tank fabrication?
__________________

__________________
GordyP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.