Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08 June 2003, 11:42   #1
Country: UK - England
Town: West Wickham
Boat name: Aries IV
Make: Scorpion
Length: 8m +
Engine: Etec 250
MMSI: 235036477
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 273
One lump or two?

Following the helpful comments of other Ribnet users, including checking out earlier threads on the subject of auxiliary engines, it does seem that - like boats themselves - auxiliaries are very much a compromise.

I appreciate that one engine is more efficient than two, but why does there seem to be a substantial school of thought that a single large engine plus a small back-up is the way to go, when there are obviously major issues over location, storage and/or manhandling of these engines?

I was at Port Hamble yesterday (on Aries II), when a 6mtr RIB cruised in and out of the marina, with hardly a sound. It was running a single Yamaha 60 four stroke.

The boat that I hope to buy (eventually) can take either a single 115hp or twin 60 hp (all 4-stroke). If you add say an 8hp aux to the 115 (even 2 stroke), the combined weight is very similar for both configurations.

The concept of twin 60's is beginning to look quite appealing - less hassle, always in use, twin 20 gal under-floor tanks, real "get you home" power. However, I would not wish the boat to suffer severely impaired performance, so I would welcome any views on the performance (and fuel consumption) of the two options.

BTW, the Yam 115 is fuel injected multivalve, whereas the Yam 60's are more conventional, albeit they are "new" (inc. 4 carburettors) for 2003.

On the same subject - what is the perception of "noise" at cruising speed (say 30kts) with these two set-ups?

Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated, thank you!


Chris Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 12:07   #2
Country: Other
Make: FB 55
Length: 10m +
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,711
My personal opinion is : IF you can afford two outboards and the rib is capable of supporting twins, this surely must be the way to go. It is a fallacy that some would suggest your consumption is double - think about it - with a twin arrangement the engine's do not have to work as hard to get you through the water. The inherent safety of a rib, first and foremost (I have proved that!) is that they are virtually unsinkable and with a twin set-up you are merely increasing your safety factor.

Charles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 12:31   #3
Country: UK - England
Make: Ribcraft 6.5
Length: 6m +
Engine: Suzuki DF175TG
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 929
I would try and stay away from the 60HP four strokes with carburettors. The new EFI models are a lot more fuel efficient and much better on the power/acceleration side too. You will have to go for Mercury or Suzuki though if you want a EFI 60HP, the Suzuki begin a lot heavier than the Mercury.

I have to agree with Charles on the twin side of things. Unless you really want to push every last knot out of the boat twins are the way to go. You have to remember though twins cost more to buy, service etc.. and fuel consumption will be greater than with a single engine (not twice as much but still more).
DJL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 12:48   #4
Country: UK - England
Town: Great Harwood, Lancs
Boat name: Tigger II
Make: Bombardier Aerodeck
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 25HP
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 626
Hi Chris

As far as I am comcerned ther is no question, if you value saftey over everything else, go for twins.

So if thats the case why does not evryone go for them.
Well their are a number of cons,

While they dont use twice the fuel the extra drag of the drive makes you loose about 25% of the extra power, i.e. a twin 50's will give you the same power as a 75hp single.

The cost of buying and servicing is higher

To make full use you need twin redundent systems, fuel, battery etc.

Given this you need to ask yourself the following questions.

How far do I go solo, would a 6HP aux get me home?.
Do i usually travel as a group
If I cant get home how close is help
If you do have to get home on a aux, are you set up to spend say 10-20 hours in a open boat?. Dont forget 1 hour at 40Kts is 10 hours at 4Kts, assuming their is no tide etc

But in real terms most people would be able to get a tow.

These days outboards are very relieable and if well looked after and serviced should ramain so, but one is better then two IF set up right.

Answer yourself the above question and then decide. If in dought and you can afford it go for twins, it the safe descision.

Regards Gary
Garygee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 15:24   #5
Country: UK - England
Town: Ardnamurchan
Boat name: Out of the Blue
Make: Ribcraft 585
Length: 5m +
Engine: Yamaha 100
MMSI: 235 079 253
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 234
I had twin 50hp on my first boat and now have a single 100hp. I much prefer the single engine set-up. I take the point about safety and with a single engine you need to plan your cruising accordingly. If you are going to remote places, go with another boat is the best thing to do.
Twins are expensive, more servicing, more drag, more weight and one engine always runs a bit better than the other so you worry about that engine.
Geoff Campbell
geoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 16:28   #6
Country: Ireland
Town: Dublin
Boat name: wizzard
Length: 7m +
Engine: 225 optimax
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 835
Twins only

I would have to say twins are the way to go manouverability with regard to turning and manouvring is excellent as they never rev quite in scyro there is a slight ressonance as the revs build, but be warned twice the maintaince and certainly twice the cost, two batteries two gear oil fills two sets of plugs.Another good thing about twins is you can swop between them if you have a fault i.e compononts etc.With twins you can stagger the trim tilt depending on weight distribution in the boat also. gavin

gavin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 June 2003, 17:44   #7
Country: UK - England
Town: Iver, Bucks, UK
Boat name: Prime Rib II
Make: Humber Ocean Pro
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mercruiser 1.7 diese
MMSI: 235086032
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 443
One other point..... (I had twin 60's on my last boat - now a single Diesel)
The idea that you'll get home quick with just one remaining engine may not be true either. Since there are two engines, you will have much higher pitch props on them than if there were only one. I had 15" on my old 5.8 Ribcraft. Great when they were working together but with the 15" and only one engine on the go I could only get about 3,000 revs and a top speed of about 8 knots. Better than your average aux perhaps.... but not much! Probably a single 60 would have been sufficient to get the boat on the plane and get 20 or so knots.... IF PROPPED CORRECTLY! but you're not going to want to change props after one engine conks out!
Two engines are psychologically safer though!.. and I would probably still prefer them myself if money were no object but……!

Mike C
Mike C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2003, 16:55   #8
Country: UK - England
Town: West Wickham
Boat name: Aries IV
Make: Scorpion
Length: 8m +
Engine: Etec 250
MMSI: 235036477
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 273
Amazing performance info ...

Thanks again for some excellent input, both technical and practical.

I have just come across Yamaha's own tests for a 6.5mtr RIB, comparing the 115 four stroke (fuel injected) with twin 60s (carburettor). Have a look at this sample:

Single 115 * * * * * * * * Twin 60


3000 * 14.7 2.4 6.13 * 14.9 5.4 * 2.76

4000 * 24.6 4.3 5.72 * 25.8 8.2 * 3.15

4500 * 28.7 5.4 5.31 * 30.3 10.0 * 3.03

5000 * 33.1 6.5 5.09 * 34.7 12.8 * 2.71

6000 * 41.7 10.8 3.86 * 42.7 16.4 * 2.60

I imagine that the figures will be slightly better for a 5.5 mtr boat.

Incidently, the single took 2.76 seconds to plane and the twin took 3.49 seconds.

Looks like I shall have to go back to the "one big lump" (+ small back-up) idea, based on this set of figures, although I wouldn't mind seeing comparative figures for 60 EFI's, before making a final decision. Any takers ???

Chris Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2003, 17:03   #9
Country: Greece
Town: Gloucetsreshire
Boat name: GATO DI MARE
Make: MAR.CO
Length: 9m +
Engine: Yamaha 200Vmax
MMSI: 235027678
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,339
Send a message via MSN to Manos Send a message via Yahoo to Manos Send a message via Skype™ to Manos
Twin engines, twin trouble, twin headake, twin petrol bills, twing service epenses, twin b@!#@!@y everything that may go wrong with them.

My advise whatever it worths single large engine with a small aux
on the side.

Had 3 bottle of wine this evening and hope this makes sence
Manos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2003, 17:15   #10
Country: Ireland
Town: Ireland
Boat name: Ally Cat
Make: Several
Length: 6m +
Engine: Several
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 333
Because of the extra drag of two engines etc a rough rule of thumb for power output from twins is 1.5 by engine HP.

So twin 60s should approximate to a single 90 etc.

Twin 100s = 150

Lots of other factors of course but it is a good rule of thumb!

Best wishes,


Stuart McNamara
Powerboat is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2015 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.