Go Back   RIBnet Forums > RIB talk > Engines & props
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 11 April 2006, 03:23   #1
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Punta gorda Fl.
Boat name: War Machine
Make: Falcon U.S.A.
Length: 9m +
Engine: twin 250 Yamaha
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Fuel issues in the U.S. ethanol in the gas

Called Yamaha here recently regarding recommendations on fuel water separator filters and was told their minimum recommendation for filters was a 10 micron filter/ 90 gph for the 250's. This was not what I had installed. We then changed them. Apparently ethanol acts as a dispersant, breaking contaminents down into smaller particles and if you do not have a adequate fuel system filter guess where it ends up? I like my motors running just as they are without fuel system problems and thought others on this forum might want to know about this so... check with your manufacturer.
__________________
pathalla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2006, 18:22   #2
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
FWIW, this is more of a problem with older fiberglass tanks, and in that case, a filter will not help. The ethanol apparently dissolves some of the resins that were used in older glas tanks, and this ends up separating out when the fuel is burned, coating valves and other internal parts with a thick black goo.

Also, rumors of MTBE and ethanol being imcompatible (also forming a sludge type material) are starting to surface.

Alcohol in the fuel *may* break down other deposits that are present in the fuel system, causing them to head engine-ward. This is the reason for a small particle filter. You should, ideally, watch for filter clogging for the first few months after going to an ethanol/gasoline blend.

And, as always, the infamous phase separation rumors (alcohol pulling water from the air, and then having the water settle out, rather than being distributed through the gas (this is the part of the water separator recommendation.)

As I recall (and I may very well be wrong on this one) the standard Yamaha in-line water separating cannister filters are 30 micron filters. I *think* that 10 micron Racor elements will fit on the filter mount that is supplied by Yamaha.

[Note that if you have the filters mounted in an enclosed area (or maybe it's just the engine room), the USCG requires metal bowls, not the see-through plastic ones.]

My boat, luckily, came with a 10 micron Racor on a Racor mount.

Luck;

jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2006, 18:34   #3
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyasaki
And, as always, the infamous phase separation rumors (alcohol pulling water from the air, and then having the water settle out, rather than being distributed through the gas (this is the part of the water separator recommendation.)
I'm not sure the thermodynamics of that make sense to me...
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2006, 22:48   #4
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polwart
I'm not sure the thermodynamics of that make sense to me...
Not sure what part of my statement raises thermodynamic questions, but to be honest, none of it makes all that much sense to me. Just reporting the rumors and concerns I've heard.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/waterphs.pdf

http://www.chevron.com/products/prod...concerns.shtml

The problem, as I understand it is that an ethanol/gas blend, when undergoing phase separation will settle the alcohol/water mix out, but it will still be combustible (to a degree.) MTBE oxygenated fuel will also separate, but the water will not combust, so the motor stops. Running on the alcohol/water mix essentially creates an extremely lean mixture, which may (probably will) cause engine damage.

Of course, that condition is exactly what the water separator is supposed to stop, so that's all theory anyway.

jky

BTW, if you specify what your question is, I might be able to give you better info, or at least point you to where you can find it.
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2006, 22:58   #5
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Punta gorda Fl.
Boat name: War Machine
Make: Falcon U.S.A.
Length: 9m +
Engine: twin 250 Yamaha
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyasaki
As I recall (and I may very well be wrong on this one) the standard Yamaha in-line water separating cannister filters are 30 micron filters. I *think* that 10 micron Racor elements will fit on the filter mount that is supplied by Yamaha.

[Note that if you have the filters mounted in an enclosed area (or maybe it's just the engine room), the USCG requires metal bowls, not the see-through plastic ones.]

My boat, luckily, came with a 10 micron Racor on a Racor mount.

Luck;

jky
Yamaha makes a 10 micron filter which is what we installed. I got the impression from the folks at Yamaha that the problem was related to contaminants already in the fuel in certain areas of the country, not contaminants in your boat, so err to the side of caution, and install the better filter.
__________________
pathalla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2006, 17:53   #6
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
Makes sense in any case.

Fuel contaminants from bunkered fuel are, while a concern, not going to be widespread, I think. One tank, and most will be gone (hopefully clogging someone else's filters and injectors.)

I personally worry more about the rumors of MTBE and ethanol not playing nice together.

jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2006, 19:34   #7
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: Tohatsu 30HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyasaki
Not sure what part of my statement raises thermodynamic questions, but to be honest, none of it makes all that much sense to me. Just reporting the rumors and concerns I've heard.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/waterphs.pdf

http://www.chevron.com/products/prod...concerns.shtml

The problem, as I understand it is that an ethanol/gas blend, when undergoing phase separation will settle the alcohol/water mix out, but it will still be combustible (to a degree.) MTBE oxygenated fuel will also separate, but the water will not combust, so the motor stops. Running on the alcohol/water mix essentially creates an extremely lean mixture, which may (probably will) cause engine damage.

Of course, that condition is exactly what the water separator is supposed to stop, so that's all theory anyway.

jky

BTW, if you specify what your question is, I might be able to give you better info, or at least point you to where you can find it.
I think the EPA document answers my questions. And basically what is says is that ethanol based fuel will take around 2 years under normal storage conditions to soak up enough moisture to cause phase separation (and until that happens the effect of the moisture will not be noticeable). So contrary to the rumours you may have heard ethanol based fuel will not "suck the moisture out of the air and then separate it out" (it was this part I was strugling with). There is a slightly higher risk of condensation or direct water contamination causing you a problem but I doubt that a modern engine would run well enough on a water/ethanol mix that you wouldn't notice the problem, and as you say almost all boats have some sort of fuel water separator. I doubt the majority of people will ever notice the difference.
__________________
Poly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2006, 00:23   #8
Member
 
Country: USA
Town: Oakland CA
Length: 3m +
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,653
FWIW, I agree with you, Polwart.

However, like many things that happen here in the US, people start screaming and crying wolf whenever a change is mandated.

I was not voicing my fears and suppositions; simply relaying concerns and problems that have been tossed around on various forums on this side of the pond.

jky
__________________
jyasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 21:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.