Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 20 May 2009, 10:12   #11
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Boat name: llyn raider
Make: xs
Length: 7m +
Engine: 1 200hp merc
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 211
I think that they were silly to take a camera crew out like that but expecting every club to code their ribs would sorta crush aloto them as most never take out paying customers and only render assistence to those in need. I am not sure what the law says but surley some common sense should be applied (not taking out a camera crew in a cramped 5m should have been common sense) as well lots of clubs borrow members ribs for large events. coding would make it prohibitivley expensive and would only stand to reduce safety levels as clubs would put out fewer ribs to deal with the costs as safety boat/ competitor ratios would be hiked up.
__________________

__________________
andyxs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2009, 13:50   #12
RIBnet supporter
 
C2 RIBS's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Hants
Boat name: Gemineye
Make: Ribeye S850 charter
Length: 8m +
Engine: 300hp
MMSI: 235097445
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Stormforce View Post
I dont think MGN280 says that this activity is excempt
Hi Doug been sad and reading through 280 and cannot find this, I thought it was OK if not done for hire or reward(money) then it had to be coded, if this is the case then I presume the RIB on the start of this thread needed coding?
I agree clubs membership do not need this if run by members for members, but what happens when say a big sailing club has an open race meetng for other clubs and people to compete as I used to do with dinghys, I saw outside RIBS brought in to help with safety cover, I guess this will be the grey area.
__________________
Ian
Rib charter and Rib hire with www.c2ribs.co.uk
C2 RIBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2009, 14:22   #13
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Weymouth
Length: no boat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 245
MGN 280 is not law currently Would be under brown code
If its the BBC or similar they should pay a charter fee and use a coded boat
__________________
I went alongside the carrier, I survived and didnt even get shot at!!!
hobbit555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2009, 18:03   #14
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2 RIBS View Post
Hi Doug been sad and reading through 280 and cannot find this, I thought it was OK if not done for hire or reward(money) then it had to be coded, if this is the case then I presume the RIB on the start of this thread needed coding?
I agree clubs membership do not need this if run by members for members, but what happens when say a big sailing club has an open race meetng for other clubs and people to compete as I used to do with dinghys, I saw outside RIBS brought in to help with safety cover, I guess this will be the grey area.
But thats not actually what the regs say is it? See my earlier post. I previously looked into this for the sort of situation you describe: club X hosts the class Y championships and club X gets a payment to cover use of facilities safety boats etc. My conclusion was that coding did not apply to members clubs if the club met the criteria and the crew were doing it for pleasure (not being paid). The only difference is there is also a camera crew here - but the rules don't describe what the boats used for - and clubs can film there own work if they wish.

Perhaps someone who is convinced it is wrong can post the exact rule which is being broken?
__________________
Poly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2009, 03:09   #15
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: Pwllheli-North Wales
Boat name: Delta 1
Make: Delta
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mariner 90hp Optimax
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,367
I've had a word with a friend who's in the know and deals with the mca on a regular basis, and while the code isn't clear the MCA’s interpretation is that they accept members paying a fee for use of a club launch as a ferry, but when a person is carried on the vessel for his or her business activity, and pays a fee or “a donation”, then that is clearly a commercial operation, and the boat is operating as a commercial workboat.

Also would their insurers be happy, as any commercial use of the boat would probaly be specifically excluded from the policy?

Jono
__________________
JG Marine Services Ltd Specialist Safety Boat Services

Bodfuan Shoot Ltd Traditional British Game Shooting
Jono Garton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2009, 15:58   #16
Member
 
havener's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Far west!
Boat name: Vigilant
Make: Humber
Length: 6m +
Engine: 90hp
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 505
If you carry out any activity for commercial gain, irrespective of who owns that boat, you should be coded appropriately.

Don't forget there is also the rescue boat code coming soon, defining vessels "provided for the public good" - this won't apply to club activities, but again stepping outside any activity strictly for members etc will start falling into one code or the other.

At the very least, I believe the RYA should be more active in inspecting the safety boats, equipment and training of their member clubs. I've done cover for various events at which the level of ability and knowledge of the club safety boat has been beyond shocking.
__________________
havener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2009, 16:09   #17
RIBnet admin team
 
Poly's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Boat name: imposter
Make: FunYak
Length: 3m +
Engine: 2 stroke YAM 20 HP
MMSI: 235089819
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by havener View Post
If you carry out any activity for commercial gain, irrespective of who owns that boat, you should be coded appropriately.
except thats not actually the wording of the regulations, (and the question would then be if the club gained commercially, and how much of the total "hosting fee" was for the boat).
__________________
Poly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2009, 14:37   #18
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Southampton
Length: no boat
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 30
Surely it also pays to consider whether it is physically possible to code a 4m searider or ribcraft 4.8 or jaffa 3.6?

From the RYA website (my bold)
Quote:
So why certificate a boat? If the boat is British and is to be used commercially at sea it is a requirement that it is SCV Certificated by one of the MCA Certification Authorities such as the RYA. Commercial use broadly means engaged in activities on a commercial basis, even if not for payment, carrying cargo or passengers. Pleasure vessels and club owned boats are excluded from the scope of the Code. It is also possible to gain some tax relief on company-owned commercial boats, and it may well be that the savings outweigh the cost of SCV Certification. Please view our current price lists and forms. If you require additional information please contact us.
I'm definitely well up for better training and higher quality kit. Perhaps we could implement a cheap version of the RYA RTE inspection for clubs, with those with unsafe working practices/no child protection rules/unservicable rescue boats disafilliated? Alternatively we could sort out a kind of (maybe RYA?) co-ordinated 'pro bono' scheme where newly qualified (and maybe even kind, experienced) PBIs give a weekend or two of their time for free to help out the rag and stick brigade.

M
__________________
Matt Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2009, 19:34   #19
Member
 
Country: UK - Wales
Town: swansea
Boat name: Too Blue
Make: BLANK
Length: 8m +
Engine: Suzuki DT225
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono Garton View Post
Polwart

You are a wealth of information and a valued member of this forum, in fact totally at the other end of the scale from codders.

Thanx for views guys.

Jono
Just can't resist can you??? Good job not everyone is as nasty and spiteful..........

At least I don't take every opportunity to get personal digs in!!!
__________________
codprawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2009, 04:11   #20
Member
 
Country: UK - England
Town: ramsgate
Boat name: Micki Dee Bee
Make: Ribcraft Seasafari
Length: 9m +
Engine: Twin 250hp Suzuki
MMSI: 235057235
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,622
Send a message via MSN to Jon Brooks
I am in the "should be coded" camp. I can see why "club" boats maybe excluded but is a private boat is used on behalf of a club then what?
Is it correctly insured? Have the crew got the right skills and or quals?

A club boat and or crew are not being paid. If it is a private boat and the fuel is paid for in what ever means its finacial gain then coded.

We carry £5mill public liabilty cover, how many private boats have that?
It all well and good to do it un coded until it all goes wrong and they find that the camera kit was not insured and nor were the "passengers"

All IMHO of course
__________________

__________________
Jon Brooks VSMM. Marine Mammal Medic, PBI, SRC Assessor,PWC Instructor.
www.horizonseasafaris.co.uk
Jon Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.