Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
 
Old 18 August 2012, 09:03   #1
RIBnet supporter
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
RIBase
Stainless steel nuts

Can anyone tell me what the diference is between A2, A4 and BZP stainless steel nuts is/are?
I want some to connect my battery terminals down. The old ones are getting a bit worse for wear.
__________________
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 09:14   #2
RIBnet Supporter
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,684
Hi Brian. BZP is Bright Zinc plated and will rust fairly quickly on a boat. A2 is "normal" stainless, A4 is "marine grade". A quick google found this which is interesting, the useful bit is at the end:

Linky

I think that a man of your standing should have shiny nuts, so if you pick A4, your nuts will be A1
__________________
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 09:21   #3
Member
 
spartacus's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Scotland
Town: Aberdeenshire
Boat name: Sula
Make: Ribcraft 4.8m
Length: 4m +
Engine: Tohatsu 70hp + aux
MMSI: 235087213
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,533
RIBase
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
Can anyone tell me what the diference is between A2, A4 and BZP stainless steel nuts is/are?
I want some to connect my battery terminals down. The old ones are getting a bit worse for wear.
For battery terminals - I don't think you have much to worry about if you use any of the materials suggested. A2 (standard grade 304) and A4 (marine grade 316) stainless steel have the same strength, the difference is to do with the higher Molybden content which gives it more corrosion resistance. A4 stuff is used in the chemical and food processing industry, pipework. BZP is mild steel, zinc plated.

More details here: Difference between 304 and 316 Marine Stainless Steel
__________________
Is that with or without VAT?
spartacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 09:48   #4
RIBnet supporter
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
RIBase
Brilliant, thanks Willk and thanks Spartacus.
I always promised before buying anything marine I would always consult "the Oracles" on here. This is after a disaster with Marine Megastore a bit back.
Well, while I am at it......how about someone looking at my posting in the Electronics section under Energy Squadron SFL 120 battery?
__________________
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 11:35   #5
Member
 
Festinghouse's Avatar
 
Country: UK - England
Town: Chorley / Holyhead
Boat name: Northwind Challenger
Make: Tornado
Length: 6m +
Engine: Mariner 115 efi CT
MMSI: 235080598
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,411
RIBase
Send a message via Skype™ to Festinghouse
a2 is fine for most things, a4 is for things that are likely to be submersed in sea water. a4 costs more so is worth thinking about he difference.
__________________
"Life may often suck, but the alternative is unacceptable"
MMSI Sticker
Festinghouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 11:55   #6
RIBnet supporter
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Isle of Man
Town: Peel, IOM
Length: no boat
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,511
RIBase
I have ordered sizes M4,5,6,8, and 10 so if anyone wants some??
All in A4.
__________________
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 11:59   #7
Member
 
Ribochet's Avatar
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Town: Rostrevor
Boat name: Ricochet
Make: Redbay
Length: 7m +
Engine: Twin F115 Yams
MMSI: 235083269
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 930
Hi Brian

Very important question - a lot of misconception about the use of S/S in marine applications.

All the above info

Here is my tuppence worth - A4 (316) has a far greater resistance to salt water corrosion. The rough rule of thumb within the marine industry is A2 (304) above the waterline, A4 below. In general however, A4 is the best grade in salt water applications.

Now the science bit (not again) - the corrosion resistance S/S depends on the addition of chromium to form chromium oxide on the surface to keep corrosion at bay. However chromium is a carbide former and it wants to produce chromium carbide which means less chromium oxide.
A4 is a "proofed" S/S which reduces the formation of the bad chromium carbide and potentially more good chromium oxide than A2.
However the downside of this is a reduction in mechanical properties ie a A4 (316) bolt has approx 1/3 the strength of an equivalent high tensile steel bolt and is a lot more brittle.
Finally be very wary of using any S/S below the waterline as there is also very little oxygen to maintain the vital chromium oxide film.

All done
__________________
Maximum Preparation - Maximum Fun
Ribochet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 12:18   #8
RIBnet Supporter
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,684
Bad Chromium!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ribochet View Post
bad chromium carbide and potentially more good chromium...
Down Boy!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Bad Chromium.jpg
Views:	291
Size:	25.0 KB
ID:	71280  
__________________
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 12:23   #9
Member
 
Ribochet's Avatar
 
Country: UK - N Ireland
Town: Rostrevor
Boat name: Ricochet
Make: Redbay
Length: 7m +
Engine: Twin F115 Yams
MMSI: 235083269
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by willk View Post
Down Boy!

I know - I forgot to take my pills this morning - must go and marshal the troops
__________________
Maximum Preparation - Maximum Fun
Ribochet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 12:45   #10
RIBnet Supporter
 
willk's Avatar
 
Country: Ireland
Length: 4m +
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ribochet View Post
must go and marshal the troops
Have a Field Day!
__________________
willk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2012, 13:39   #11
Member
 
martini's Avatar
 
Country: UK - Channel Islands
Town: jersey
Boat name: Martini II
Make: Arctic 28/FC470
Length: 8m +
Engine: twin 225Opti/50hp 2t
MMSI: 235067688
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,030
I disagree with the above comments re 316 below waterline, 304 above.

Stainless shouldn't be used below the waterline as the lack of oxygen stops it from oxidising and self passivating. That said, it's not a major problem unless its something important like a seacock etc.

304 is most commonly used for kitchens and kitchenware. At work we wouldn't use 304 outdoors anywhere in Jersey as you're never more than a few miles from the sea, let alone on a boat!

And as for BZP.....
__________________
martini is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 21:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.