More lies - Page 5

codprawn · 15 April 2005, 21:10

Believe it or not in the 1920s there were about 7000 deaths a year on British roads - despite the fact there were only 1,000,000 vehicles and the speed limit was 20mph!!!!

Andy Gee · 16 April 2005, 10:04

A certin menber of these boards got done about 5 years ago in the RIB I had then, I thing he got clocked doing 28 knots in a 5 knot restricted area by the Mod Plod. After much arguing along the line of "and show me where on this chart it says a speed restricted area" they still gave his young son a warning with names address etc etc

.
They then procceded to tell him that he can apply for an exemption from the QHM (lots of nuclear subs and stuff up here) to break the limit. The crazy thing is that the Sea Loch he was in is Fecking massive with the base on one side and him on the other

Scary Des · 20 April 2005, 15:52

If you can’t bet them join them

that is why I have just placed an order for my own Gatso, cost £40k but if you can get £750k in two months seems like a good investment, now what new rib shall I order

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...es/4463961.stm

Take a look at this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/arti...462183,00.html You and I would have received a ban for twice the speed limit, still I’m sure that the next time I’m late for a meeting the magistrates will take the same view

Des

Scary Des · 20 April 2005, 16:13

Look at this just backs up everything i've been saying

Des

codprawn · 20 April 2005, 16:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scary Des

If you can’t bet them join them

that is why I have just placed an order for my own Gatso, cost £40k but if you can get £750k in two months seems like a good investment, now what new rib shall I order

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...es/4463961.stm

Take a look at this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/arti...462183,00.html You and I would have received a ban for twice the speed limit, still I’m sure that the next time I’m late for a meeting the magistrates will take the same view

Des

I like the 2nd one - what a bloody hypocrite!!!

A while ago a speed camera was placed near roadworks on the M4 past where the roadworks actually were. 2000 motorists were wrongfully convicted of speeding.
Only 3 people found out that they could complain and get their fines refunded and their points removed. The saftey camera partnership REFUSED to send letters out to the remaining motorists to advise them a mistake had been made!!!!!
The scumbags are quick enough to write to you when you get caught!!!

Keith Hart · 20 April 2005, 16:55

I now have the ultimate vehicle to beat the speed cameras. No it hasn't got 'stealth technology', it just doesn't go fast enough.

Anyway, I called in at the local tip today (loads of junk we are not taking to Scotland). I pulled up at the cubicle and the chap looked up at me in the cab, he was obviously wondering what the heck this army vehicle was doing there. As you all know you have to tell them what sort of waste you have, then they tell you which skip to put it in.

I looked him straight in the eye (he only had one) and said, "Nuclear waste mate!"

He stared at me quizically. I could see his brain ticking over as he thought, 'I don't think we take that here...?'

I let him stew for a few seconds.

"Only joking, general household waste really."

He breathed a sigh of relief. "Number 14 mate."

Off I went and dumped my plastic bags. Afterwards I thought, 'hey that was easy, maybe when I'm up in Scotland I could get a contract with Dounreay to dispose of their stuff'.

Keith (geiger counter) Hart

Scary Des · 26 May 2005, 13:38

Look at this

I love this

BBC Quote:-'By aiming at the wall and pulling the trigger whilst panning with the device we managed to get a reading of 58mph from the stationary wall - enough to get three points and a fine in urban areas'

Des

Phil Davies · 26 May 2005, 14:45

The only real protection against police laser is a jammer and if their legality wasn't such a grey area, I'd have one tomorrow. The government also have plans to ban radar and laser detectors (which are different to jammers), although the gps based fixed camera detectors will remain legal.

http://www.networxautomotive.com/k40_defuserplus.html

codprawn · 26 May 2005, 15:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Davies

The only real protection against police laser is a jammer and if their legality wasn't such a grey area, I'd have one tomorrow. The government also have plans to ban radar and laser detectors (which are different to jammers), although the gps based fixed camera detectors will remain legal.

http://www.networxautomotive.com/k40_defuserplus.html

Along with removing every other civil liberty we have - roll on Tony Blair!!!

codprawn · 26 May 2005, 15:33

Ah but I forgot - all this is in the public good as they keep telling us - along with id cards - of course if that hadn't let in all these immigrants and stirred up the Arabs........

Gav · 26 May 2005, 22:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by codprawn

Ah but I forgot - all this is in the public good as they keep telling us - along with id cards - of course if that hadn't let in all these immigrants and stirred up the Arabs........

I think the ID cards will be a good idea, One universal form of ID !

Dont agree with having to pay the 90 quid for it though!

codprawn · 27 May 2005, 03:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gav

I think the ID cards will be a good idea, One universal form of ID !

Dont agree with having to pay the 90 quid for it though!

So the government can keep tabs on us all the more??? Like they drafted in all these anti terror laws - most are to stop people avoiding tax!!!

Gav · 27 May 2005, 06:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by codprawn

So the government can keep tabs on us all the more??

like most things in this life we are blessed with, there is always an upside and downside! on the good side it will speed up the process lots of things we do that need ID.......... a lot of fraud will be stamped out.........

so what ARE the bad points?

Nick Hearne · 27 May 2005, 07:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gav

like most things in this life we are blessed with, there is always an upside and downside! on the good side it will speed up the process lots of things we do that need ID.......... a lot of fraud will be stamped out.........

so what ARE the bad points?

It's going to cost us lots & lots of money!
You will still get fraud!
ID well you can get a passport a lot cheaper!

Scary Des · 27 May 2005, 08:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gav

.......... a lot of fraud will be stamped out........

No it won’t

who are the first people to own fake passports, credit cards etc it’s the criminals

this is more spin and manipulation by Phoney Tony

When we had a real terrorist risk from the IRA there was no mention of ID cards so why now

...... I’m beginning to sound like Codders

any way I have this mate who owns a nuclear sub and he was videoing......does it need coding........

.Des

Jono · 27 May 2005, 08:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gav

like most things in this life we are blessed with, there is always an upside and downside! on the good side it will speed up the process lots of things we do that need ID.......... a lot of fraud will be stamped out.........

so what ARE the bad points?

Well for a start..you don't think they're gonna issue you with one , do you, Abdul?

Gav · 27 May 2005, 18:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jono

Well for a start..you don't think they're gonna issue you with one , do you, Abdul?

feck orf baldy!!

i think you lot are a bit too synical and short sighted, but thats just my opinion!

suck it n see! cus you aint got a lot of choice in the matter..............

Mollers · 12 September 2005, 08:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noddy

I bet you are one of those that think that The Police should concentrate on the real villains and leave law abiding people like you alone?
Martyn

Sounds familiar Nodders!

You love this old chestnut!! Boring

Simon B · 12 September 2005, 08:51

Tell you what, if Phoney Blair and co really wanted to keep tabs on us all they need to do is change the law (again) make all the mobile companies disclose who owns relevant sims and handsets and have the gps chip enabled. Most phones have them....or is it an urban myth?

I'd belive the prof that told me he lectures in Geodesey. There's too much dosh wrapped up in speed cams now for motorists to moan we just need a few poor sods to get splattered in the speed up zone after the camera.

Ofcourse a real road designer would ensure that the mean speed of the road was lower if that was what was required, which it probably wasnt, as the bent politicians that would have championed the road no doubt said it would assist in the speedy flow of traffic.

Tell you what, I've just had one of those being John Malkovich moments except it was Codders. Was nice to have a chemistry degree for a couple of minutes.