Originally Posted by macattack101
Guys the Google map site isn't the best for looking at these. Try the bing maps and get a fright.
Wow. You're not kiding! That's about a million times better than Google! Especially helped by the fact the photos seem to have been taken at low tide on a clear day, wheras the google ones show an incredibly muddy river at high tide!
Two things jump out at me at the moment:
1) the bit that supposedly dries out looks pretty harmless i nthe pics.
2) there is absolutely no sign of the Clacks bridge, or the works associated with it, so I reckon those photos are at least 5 years old - how much has it all shifted?
It does, however amply demostrate the "rapids" I was told about!
I shall go & compare with notes & charts (agian).